Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: June 17, 2024, 7:05 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Atheism the unscientific belief (part one, two, and three)
RE: Atheism. The UNscientific belief (part two)
(October 1, 2015 at 10:13 am)Little Rik Wrote:
(September 29, 2015 at 2:45 pm)Jörmungandr Wrote: You seem to be under the impression that Rik is Christian.  He is not.  He's a follower of Ananda Marga, a sect of Hinduism.


I really need your help yogini.
Please help and tell Little Rik how AM. is a sect of Hinduism when in fact the AM yoga philosophy originate long before Hinduism?  I'm all ears!

Ananda Marga yoga originated with PR Sarkar in the twentieth century. You can claim ancient roots all you want, AM didn't exist before Sarkar.
[Image: extraordinarywoo-sig.jpg]
Reply
RE: Atheism. The UNscientific belief (part two)
(October 1, 2015 at 10:27 am)Little Rik Wrote:
(October 1, 2015 at 10:16 am)RaphielDrake Wrote: Well thank fuck for your yoga philosophy. I mean without it how else would we determine the inner workings of the universe via sub-standard poetry?
I don't know about you guys but I'm ready to march over to CERN and tell them to stop wasting their time.


They are not wasting their time at all.
In fact slowly slowly they are getting there but this there will be the border between the physical universe and what is behind this universe.
Once they get at the border they for sure will want to cross this border and merge in the real thing.
But at this stage you wouldn't have a clue what this is.
But don't despair Drake.
Give time and everything will be sorted out.  Smile    Hi  Smile

Yes, once they've discovered the truth they'll look back at your somewhat criminal overuse of the rule of three and say to themselves; 
"Wow, that guy knew all along what we had actually gone to university and studied countless mentally grueling years to discover. Lets toss aside the lab coats and our clearly flawed requirement for evidence and reasoning. Lets get some sweat pants, do some stretches and butcher whats left of the English language."

Oh I'm not despairing. I'm waiting with bated breath for the next gem of wisdom which to the naked eye looks suspiciously brown and imperfectly shaped but to those with perfect clarity it is a treasure to hold up and cherish. 
I truly hope your words are immortalized for all to see for future generations. Nay, I do not need to hope. Through the wonders of the internet this is a reality. Smile
"That is not dead which can eternal lie and with strange aeons even death may die." 
- Abdul Alhazred.
Reply
RE: Atheism. The UNscientific belief (part two)
(October 1, 2015 at 10:39 am)Jörmungandr Wrote:
(October 1, 2015 at 10:13 am)Little Rik Wrote: I really need your help yogini.
Please help and tell Little Rik how AM. is a sect of Hinduism when in fact the AM yoga philosophy originate long before Hinduism?  I'm all ears!

Ananda Marga yoga originated with PR Sarkar in the twentieth century.  You can claim ancient roots all you want, AM didn't exist before Sarkar.


If that is true why then AM philosophy and Shiva philosophy go hand in hand?  I'm all ears!
Reply
RE: Atheism. The UNscientific belief (part two)
(October 1, 2015 at 10:44 am)Little Rik Wrote:
(October 1, 2015 at 10:39 am)Jörmungandr Wrote: Ananda Marga yoga originated with PR Sarkar in the twentieth century.  You can claim ancient roots all you want, AM didn't exist before Sarkar.


If that is true why then AM philosophy and Shiva philosophy go hand in hand?  I'm all ears!

Simple. Sarkar borrowed parts of older Hindu philosophy. Do you really need to be told these things?
[Image: extraordinarywoo-sig.jpg]
Reply
RE: Atheism. The UNscientific belief (part two)
Gee, thanks Rik, for reminding me that it's not JUST the fundies that are completely, wack-job, out-of-touch-with-reality, grab-the-straightjacket batshit insane.  Wow.   

Other than the slightly odd language, the pattern is exactly the same.  Poster makes a claim for something that can't be measured and must be taken on faith.  Poster doesn't get positive responses and starts calling non-believers stupid.  Non-believers counter with scientific evidence.  Poster dismisses scientific evidence, amps up the insults, adds on more smilies.    

It's like trying to argue with a 3-year-old who has missed his nap and eaten three boxes of snack cakes.
"The family that prays together...is brainwashing their children."- Albert Einstein
Reply
RE: Atheism. The UNscientific belief (part two)
Give me the over-stimulated brat any day.
Reply
RE: Atheism. The UNscientific belief (part two)
I could maybe tolerate the inane, Chopra-esque ramblings if he'd stop using those fucking bunny ears icons.

It's the only possible way to make a Wooist more annoying.
A Christian told me: if you were saved you cant lose your salvation. you're sealed with the Holy Ghost

I replied: Can I refuse? Because I find the entire concept of vicarious blood sacrifice atonement to be morally abhorrent, the concept of holding flawed creatures permanently accountable for social misbehaviors and thought crimes to be morally abhorrent, and the concept of calling something "free" when it comes with the strings of subjugation and obedience perhaps the most morally abhorrent of all... and that's without even going into the history of justifying genocide, slavery, rape, misogyny, religious intolerance, and suppression of free speech which has been attributed by your own scriptures to your deity. I want a refund. I would burn happily rather than serve the monster you profess to love.

Reply
RE: Atheism. The UNscientific belief (part two)
(October 1, 2015 at 11:20 am)TheRocketSurgeon Wrote: I could maybe tolerate the inane, Chopra-esque ramblings if he'd stop using those fucking bunny ears icons.
[...]

I know, right? 

Hey Rik - this is an internet forum. Your ears won't do any good. In order for you to understand, why you're wrong about everything you claim - you need to be able to read. With your EYES.

You didn't think about that, did you, Rikky?

FSM Grin Shy Rolleyes Cool FSM Grin
"The fact that a believer is happier than a skeptic is no more to the point than the fact that a drunken man is happier than a sober one." - George Bernard Shaw
Reply
RE: Atheism. The UNscientific belief (part two)
(September 30, 2015 at 5:38 pm)Homeless Nutter Wrote: Even though wishful thinking morons, like Little cRiket have been trying to do that for tens of thousands of years.

It only took science less than 100 years, between theory of evolution and discovery of genetics, confirming it. Yet magic people are still as deep in the woods, as they ever were.

(September 30, 2015 at 9:51 pm)RaphielDrake Wrote: You're right. Lets assume theres an afterlife. That is after all the only scientific option left by your extremely convincing and 100 percent fact checked... poem?

Do you ever catch yourself wondering what someone like you is doing actually existing as opposed to being a fictional character in a precautionary tale about the dangers of being so far up your own arse you can taste your next speech?


Moderator Notice
I don't like being ignored, I really don't. I suggest you take my advice, ladies or gentlemen, and cool it. 

Otherwise, the question is:

[Image: 12074653_1031490373562239_34338704359372...e=56910BE6]
If I were to create self aware beings knowing fully what they would do in their lifetimes, I sure wouldn't create a HELL for the majority of them to live in infinitely! That's not Love, that's sadistic. Therefore a truly loving god does not exist!

Quote:The sin is against an infinite being (God) unforgiven infinitely, therefore the punishment is infinite.

Dead wrong.  The actions of a finite being measured against an infinite one are infinitesimal and therefore merit infinitesimal punishment.

Quote:Some people deserve hell.

I say again:  No exceptions.  Punishment should be equal to the crime, not in excess of it.  As soon as the punishment is greater than the crime, the punisher is in the wrong.

[Image: tumblr_n1j4lmACk61qchtw3o1_500.gif]
Reply
RE: Atheism. The UNscientific belief (part two)
Frustration grows... Oh well, you saw speedbump. Carry on in a civil manner. And by civil, I mean a little less than Youtube comment grade. I quit doing such stuff. I am not telling you, I am giving advice Wink
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Christian and Atheism Worldwide Demographics: Current Realities and Future Trends. Nishant Xavier 55 2941 July 9, 2023 at 6:07 am
Last Post: no one
  How do I deal with the belief that maybe... Just maybe... God exists and I'm... Gentle_Idiot 75 6858 November 23, 2022 at 5:34 pm
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  How may one refute the religious stonewall argument "all is one"? Osopatata 29 2899 December 21, 2020 at 4:05 pm
Last Post: HappySkeptic
  Philosophical Failures of Christian Apologetics, Part 11: The Holy Spirit Cepheus Ace 18 3125 June 22, 2020 at 7:45 pm
Last Post: Fake Messiah
  Belief in God is a clinic Interaktive 55 5977 April 1, 2019 at 10:55 pm
Last Post: LostLocke
  Is atheism a belief? Agnostico 1023 88751 March 16, 2019 at 1:42 pm
Last Post: Catharsis
  Isn't Atheism anti Christian than anti religious? Western part atleast Kibbi 14 3601 October 5, 2018 at 9:09 pm
Last Post: Dr H
  Do you know that homeopathy doesn't work, or do you just lack belief that it does? I_am_not_mafia 24 5389 August 25, 2018 at 4:34 am
Last Post: EgoDeath
  Two Myths I Wish Atheists Would Stop Buying Into Rhondazvous 26 4841 June 7, 2018 at 8:21 pm
Last Post: chimp3
  Why Atheism/Secular Humanism... Part II TheReal 53 26156 April 23, 2018 at 4:48 pm
Last Post: Mystic



Users browsing this thread: 4 Guest(s)