(October 24, 2015 at 10:23 am)Homeless Nutter Wrote:(October 24, 2015 at 10:05 am)Little Rik Wrote: How the hell can the matter produce elements that are superior in their evolutionary level as air
and water?
Quote:There is no such thing as "elements superior in their evolutionary level" and neither air nor water are chemical elements. Evolution has nothing to do with elements - it's a biological process. Children learn this - unless they're particularly stupid, or their parents don't give a sh*t about them. Possibly - both.
You are headstrong than i thought.
For elements i refer to the original meaning not the modern chemical elements.
The ancient Greek belief in five basic elements, these being earth (γῆ ge), water (ὕδωρ hudor), air (ἀήρ aer), fire (πῦρ pur) and aether (αἰθήρ aither), dates from pre-Socratic times and persisted throughout the Middle Ages and into the Renaissance, deeply influencing European thought and culture. These five elements are sometimes associated with the five platonic solids.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Classical_element
Quote:I'm sorry for using all those big words - sometimes I forget how uneducated and brainwashed you hindus are...
Oh, please don't be sorry.
It is quite understandable for an headstrong to use big words and to bray.
Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: December 28, 2024, 10:41 pm
Thread Rating:
Atheism the unscientific belief (part one, two, and three)
|
(October 26, 2015 at 9:31 am)Little Rik Wrote: [...]For elements i refer to the original meaning not the modern chemical elements. [...] Oh, so now you're using some ancient greek dogmas, to back up your hindu ones? Have you got any proof that the "classical elements" are anything other than useless pre-scientific bullsh*t? No? Oh, that's such a shame... Better luck with your next load of crap. Hey, puss-for-brains - the world has moved on a few thousand years. How about you catch up? Let us know when you're somewhere around 20th century and we'll talk.
"The fact that a believer is happier than a skeptic is no more to the point than the fact that a drunken man is happier than a sober one." - George Bernard Shaw
(October 24, 2015 at 12:25 pm)robvalue Wrote:(October 23, 2015 at 5:12 pm)robvalue Wrote: If atheism is a belief, please tell me what that belief is. Yes it has been answered already but you didn't pay attention. Any idea is something coming from a together of other thoughts. It is not possible out of the blue to say ........ i am atheist .....without first have thought about different issues like the possibility that the universe doesn't need a creator or the fact that if God would exist he-she wouldn't let the creation go to the dogs and so many other issues. Once you reach the mental stage that there can not be a God then you create a believe based on a myriad of different understanding of how the system works. To say that you don't believe because there is no evidence is absurd. It would be a thought out of the blue with no foundation and therefore doesn't make any sense. (October 26, 2015 at 9:42 am)Homeless Nutter Wrote:(October 26, 2015 at 9:31 am)Little Rik Wrote: [...]For elements i refer to the original meaning not the modern chemical elements. [...] Nutter, ever you ever heard about foundations? Like the foundation to build a house or the foundation in a more abstract term like to produce something new by relying on the old? Suppose someone build a new engine. He can't just out of the blue make a new engine unless he takes from the old and adding more technology. Greek, Latin and Sanskrit are the foundations which the new come from so if you know the old it is so much easier to understand the new but an ignorant like you still think that the new can be created without foundations. RE: Atheism. The UNscientific belief (part two)
October 26, 2015 at 10:26 am
(This post was last modified: October 26, 2015 at 10:26 am by LostLocke.)
(October 26, 2015 at 10:01 am)Little Rik Wrote:We don't know, or claim to know, that the universe does not need a creator. It might. It might not.(October 24, 2015 at 12:25 pm)robvalue Wrote: I don't believe this has yet been answered. But so far, we see no indication that there is a creator. (October 26, 2015 at 10:01 am)Little Rik Wrote: or the fact that if God would exist he-she wouldn't let the creation goThat's an emotional response. What we think about a god has nothing to do with whether or not that god exists. Thinking god is evil and mean doesn't make him go away if he's real. Thinking god is love and kindness doesn't make him real if he doesn't already exist. (October 26, 2015 at 10:01 am)Little Rik Wrote: To say that you don't believe because there is no evidence is absurd.Wrong! The only reason to believe in something is because there's some kind of evidence of its existence. If there is no evidence of it there's no reason to believe it exists, until such time that evidence comes forward to change that. RE: Atheism. The UNscientific belief (part two)
October 26, 2015 at 10:33 am
(This post was last modified: October 26, 2015 at 10:38 am by Homeless Nutter.)
(October 26, 2015 at 10:19 am)Little Rik Wrote: Nutter, ever you ever heard about foundations? Here's the problem with your dogma - you can't build a house on a foundation made of pure sh*t. You didn't think about that, did you?
"The fact that a believer is happier than a skeptic is no more to the point than the fact that a drunken man is happier than a sober one." - George Bernard Shaw
(October 24, 2015 at 11:33 am)Jörmungandr Wrote:(October 24, 2015 at 7:11 am)Little Rik Wrote: What a disappointment yogini! I certainly have the evidence yog. I never been able to touch, see or smell the mind or the consciousness but i am able to use my senses to perceive the matter, water, light, air and space. RE: Atheism. The UNscientific belief (part two)
October 26, 2015 at 10:44 am
(This post was last modified: October 26, 2015 at 10:45 am by Little Rik.)
(October 26, 2015 at 10:33 am)Homeless Nutter Wrote:(October 26, 2015 at 10:19 am)Little Rik Wrote: Nutter, ever you ever heard about foundations? You fail once again Nutter. You can not compete not just with me but with anybody else. You are also an absolute embarrassment to your fellow atheist. (October 26, 2015 at 10:01 am)Little Rik Wrote:(October 24, 2015 at 12:25 pm)robvalue Wrote: I don't believe this has yet been answered. Atheism is not those thoughts. You're tagging on other thoughts that you logically think lead to atheism. People can get to atheism through any number of reasons, and whatever those reasons are, they are not atheism either. This is the problem I think, you're treating what you think atheists must also think as atheism. It is not. It is simply the lack of a god belief. Feel free to send me a private message.
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists. Index of useful threads and discussions Index of my best videos Quickstart guide to the forum |
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Users browsing this thread: 71 Guest(s)