For those who want proof of the exodus

[ApeNotKillApe]

So did God have to go through a redemption of some sort?

He wouldn't have to but he did so that he may share His righteousness with us.

Implying he couldn't share his righteousness without sacrificing himself?

[Drich]

When have I come to you for help unless I truly felt 'oppressed' by 'someone' on your staff using staff related 'power' in an oppressive way? In other words have I ever come to you crying about any member has said or done? that would mean the only time I ever go to you is because someone on staff is treating me unfairly/threating or banned me.

IF you truly are an admin who doesn't look to oppress it's members, then one would think that personal feelings aside you would look to eliminate oppression where ever it may arise and seek to put an end to it no matter how the battle lines are drawn.. Rather it SEEMS 'justice' is only offered to those in whom you deem 'just.'

IF this is the case, then what will be, will be.

Drich, I just got done telling you to leave me alone. You are dead to me. Now stay buried.

Just asking for a point of clarity....

In your original post you said don't come to you as an administrator.. Now it seems your asking I do not address you or your posts at all. Which is it?

[Drich]

He wouldn't have to but he did so that he may share His righteousness with us.

Implying he couldn't share his righteousness without sacrificing himself?

Apparently not in a meaningful enough way so that we may comprehend what He endured to offer atonement that buys righteousness for us.

[Cyberman]

Your post was all about my position as Admin. There weren't two consecutive words that weren't on the subject.

[Drich]

Your post was all about my position as Admin. There weren't two consecutive words that weren't on the subject.

You sure you want to do this because any friends and family discount you may have had at our company store will no longer be honored.

[Minimalist]

So did God have to go through a redemption of some sort?

He wouldn't have to but he did so that he may share His righteousness with us.

Then he's an asshole.

Every time you post, drippy, you make H. L. Mencken more and more prophetic.

God is the immemorial refuge of the incompetent, the helpless, the miserable. They find not only sanctuary in His arms, but also a kind of superiority, soothing to their macerated egos: He will set them above their betters.
— H L Mencken

[Cyberman]

Your post was all about my position as Admin. There weren't two consecutive words that weren't on the subject.

You sure you want to do this because any friends and family discount you may have had at our company store will no longer be honored.

I shall have to find the strength within myself to survive, won't I?

[Wyrd of Gawd]

He wouldn't have to but he did so that he may share His righteousness with us.

Implying he couldn't share his righteousness without sacrificing himself?

Christianity = the death cult religion.

[Drich]

You sure you want to do this because any friends and family discount you may have had at our company store will no longer be honored.

I shall have to find the strength within myself to survive, won't I?

Now you know what I feel when you tell me your removing your 'hedge of protection' and I'm on my own.

[Mudhammam]

So your good with someone else doing your thinking for you?

The wiki arrival does not even address the evid need provided.

The second focuses on the improbability that conventional wisdom and dates can not be wrong.

What both fail to address is what the film does do very well. Provide archeological evid nice for the Joseph, Joseph's saving Egypt from a 7 year drout Joseph's grave the grave to his twelve brothers. The city where the family of Joseph grew into the nation of Israel. The evidences for the enslavement, the evidences for all the 1 born males being slaughtered in the time of Moses. The Egyptian papyrus that describes the plagues, the written Egyptian evidence for the exodus. The loss of their army. The destruction of Jericho 40 years later and on and on and on...

So there's that. The only thing holding back verification is our current perception of egypts time line.

You articals claim that what this film doesn't do is offer anything new. Let me ask you then. When you all say their is absolutely nothing in egypts history that shows Jews being slaves to Egypt, why is the information provided in this film omitted? Even if it does not fit the current time line their is proof of Jewish enslavement and exodus.

You do realize that the stories related to Joseph, such as the episode involving Potipher's wife, and the seven year droughts in Egypt, are derived from earlier non-biblical sources, in which the characters, places, and situations are differently portrayed, and not original to the Hebrews, right?