Catholic Church Opposes Removing Statute of Limitations for Child Rape

[Minimalist]

Upon more reflection, maybe this is where we get pragmatic.

1500 years of Catholic priest pedophilia and it's as bad as it's ever been:


Maybe we need to regulate it instead of prohibit it ??

Set some minimum weight a male child has to be before he can be safely anally sodomized with a minimal risk of tearing.  Screen the priests for communicable diseases.  The money saved in lawsuits (if it's legal, no one can sue) can be used to salve the guilt of parents who would sign the consent forms for their kids to be abused.  Maybe limiting selection of kids to the disabled ones, preferably the mute ones so they can't discuss their experiences, would be considered a blessing/sacrament too ?

And then the  rest of us can go back to worrying about oceanic acidification.

So you're suggesting signs like this outside of all churches?



The idea has merit.

[Cyberman]

The institution already is bankrupt. Morally, ethically and spiritually.

Remember what it did to Hitler.  He spent too much time around those creeps and they turned him to the dark side.

Nah, Hitler was a Martian. They want to destroy all humans.

[robvalue]

Since no Catholics want to comment, I've decided to become catholic for the duration of the next paragraph. Who's going to stop me?

I'm absolutely fine with this, and I'll continue to donate money knowing that it's explicitly going towards shielding child abusers. After all, the religion is still true regardless, the church does some good things as well as being a criminal organisation, and God requires money to keep on existing.

OK, atheist again. What the hell? I can't believe I just said that. I didn't enjoy my time as a catholic, I was very conflicted. I had no source of subjective morality to guide me.

[Esquilax]

"Such a law in New York would cause the Church “catastrophic financial harm,” according to a statement of opposition from The New York State Catholic Conference,..."

And "our objectively real law breaking would have legal consequences for us," is an argument.... why?

You can get fined for speeding in your car, but child molestation should not be punished... because you would find the punishment unpleasant? Does the Catholic church understand what the law is? Or have they been above it so long that they only have the vaguest idea of what it's supposed to be for?

[Minimalist]

I didn't enjoy my time as a catholic

As long as you didn't molest any children.  But if you want to get really pissed, listen to this douchebag.

http://www.rawstory.com/2016/04/church-m...appealing/

‘Church Militant’ says ‘feminized kids’ caused sex scandals — and altar girls are unappealing

This is the kind of fucktardery that jesus inspires.

[Cyberman]

I've seen twatbags like that saying that the children they raped - some no older than four - shouldn't dress so slutty. So no, nothing will surprise me anymore.

[robvalue]

Shit, I just thought. I was only Catholic for about a minute. Does that mean I'm Catholic forever though?

[vorlon13]

I think we can get a rush job on an excommunication for you there.

Maybe even the full bell, book and candle routine.

[SteelCurtain]

We need to test if he floats first. We might have to go another route...

[robvalue]

Still no comments from our Catholics.

Actions speak louder than words, and silence speaks louder than actions. Money talks, bullshit walks and the greedy fat cats eat it up with their forks.

I'm gonna have to speak for them again soon

Yeah but school teachers do it too!

Do they? Do the top management of "school teachers" lobby to protect child abusers? What would it take for people to stop financially supporting them, I wonder? So much for fucking morality.