Three Questions for God

[BrianSoddingBoru4]

Ok, three more questions for God:

1. Does it make you uncomfortable the Drich is speaking on your behalf?

2. Mightn't it be in your best interests to strike Drich with lightning to stop him speaking on your behalf?

3. Since you're all-powerful, couldn't you find someone other than a child-beating, mouth-breathing knuckle-dragger (AKA Drich) to speak on your behalf?

Thank you in advance for your prompt reply.

Boru

[Drich]

2.Again which ever one Zings the hardest.. meaning if you mom has a free porn site I was referring to your boy friend site is a pay as you go deal.

Your idiotic implication that I have a boyfriend who does internet porn is inflammatory, unjust, and just plain childish.

---

He does Gender Fluid Adult Entertainment, NOT porn.

---

Boru

Oh, unlike the question that begged that response? "God, why do people pay for porn?" or did you forget you part in all of this? is maintaining a double standard hypocrisy a big goal in your life?

[Drich]

Ok, three more questions for God:

1.  Does it make you uncomfortable the Drich is speaking on your behalf?

2.  Mightn't it be in your best interests to strike Drich with lightning to stop him speaking on your behalf?

3.  Since you're all-powerful, couldn't you find someone other than a child-beating, mouth-breathing knuckle-dragger (AKA Drich) to speak on your behalf?

Thank you in advance for your prompt reply.

Boru

I would happily respond normally, but it seems "the sodder" has trouble taking a dose of his own medicine.

[rexbeccarox]

Ok, three more questions for God:

1.  Does it make you uncomfortable the Drich is speaking on your behalf?

2.  Mightn't it be in your best interests to strike Drich with lightning to stop him speaking on your behalf?

3.  Since you're all-powerful, couldn't you find someone other than a child-beating, mouth-breathing knuckle-dragger (AKA Drich) to speak on your behalf?

Thank you in advance for your prompt reply.

Boru

I would happily respond normally, but it seems "the sodder" has trouble taking a dose of his own medicine.

But that's the thing: this thread isn't about you... unless you're God. Are you God, Drich? No? Then who asked you to respond?

[Drich]

I would happily respond normally, but it seems "the sodder" has trouble taking a dose of his own medicine.

But that's the thing: this thread isn't about you... unless you're God. Are you God, Drich? No? Then who asked you to respond?

At any point in this thread did i ever claim to be? The real thing is I have made a disclaimer that I am not God each and every time I gave what i thought an accurate approximation of his answer would be. And yet you all Failed to address the points I made. How then do you think you'd do bringing your charges and BS question before the Real deal if you all are having so much trouble with little old me?

[rexbeccarox]

But that's the thing: this thread isn't about you... unless you're God. Are you God, Drich? No? Then who asked you to respond?

At any point in this thread did i ever claim to be? The real thing is I have made a disclaimer that I am not God each and every time I gave what i thought an accurate approximation of his answer would be. And yet you all Failed to address the points I made. How then do you think you'd do bringing your charges and BS question before the Real deal if you all are having so much trouble with little old me?

I never said you did claim to be. That's why I asked. If you're not God, why do you think you have any authority to answer the questions put forth? Why should anyone have any inclination to listen to you?

BTW- I haven't put forth any questions or "charges" in this thread, so I have no idea why you think I'm having any trouble with you. I think you're vile, yes, but intellectually, you're no match for most here. So who are the "you all" you speak of?

[Drich]

At any point in this thread did i ever claim to be? The real thing is I have made a disclaimer that I am not God each and every time I gave what i thought an accurate approximation of his answer would be. And yet you all Failed to address the points I made. How then do you think you'd do bringing your charges and BS question before the Real deal if you all are having so much trouble with little old me?

I never said you did claim to be. That's why I asked. If you're not God, why do you think you have any authority to answer the questions put forth? Why should anyone have any inclination to listen to you?

BTW- I haven't put forth any questions or "charges" in this thread, so I have no idea why you think I'm having any trouble with you. I think you're vile, yes, but intellectually, you're no match for most here. So who are the "you all" you speak of?

Why? because that is our charge as Christians. We are to tell people the Good news of salvation and of God. Naturally people will want to know who He is and how He thinks. As such He has revealed his nature to us in scripture. therefore if one knows the revealed nature of God then He can approximate a response based on the formula he has left behind through out the bible.
That speaks tot he authority and why, that you asked.

The 'you all' refers to those who drop their original line of question to regroup and approach with Ad Hoc attacks rather than respond to the line of questioning they started with.

You yourself can pretend that you are my intellectual superior all you like, but you can not deny that more than one has left his original line of questioning to directly confront me with a personal insult or charge rather than stay on topic.

[Cyberman]

That's not a badge of victory, Drich. It's a sign that you attract derision. Wear it with pride if it's an achievement for you by all means, but don't misunderstand it and imagine it's our problem.

[rexbeccarox]

I never said you did claim to be. That's why I asked. If you're not God, why do you think you have any authority to answer the questions put forth? Why should anyone have any inclination to listen to you?

BTW- I haven't put forth any questions or "charges" in this thread, so I have no idea why you think I'm having any trouble with you. I think you're vile, yes, but intellectually, you're no match for most here. So who are the "you all" you speak of?

Why? because that is our charge as Christians. We are to tell people the Good news of salvation and of God. Naturally people will want to know who He is and how He thinks. As such He has revealed his nature to us in scripture. therefore if one knows the revealed nature of God then He can approximate a response based on the formula he has left behind through out the bible.
That speaks tot he authority and why, that you asked.

The 'you all' refers to those who drop their original line of question to regroup and approach with Ad Hoc attacks rather than respond to the line of questioning they started with.

You yourself can pretend that you are my intellectual superior all you like, but you can not deny that more than one has left his original line of questioning to directly confront me with a personal insult or charge rather than stay on topic.

Believe me: I'm not pretending.

[Drich]

That's not a badge of victory, Drich. It's a sign that you attract derision. Wear it with pride if it's an achievement for you by all means, but don't misunderstand it and imagine it's our problem.

I attract "derision" not on the outset of an arguement, but when you all see the logical end of a discussion you can not win.

If I were so detestable then I would not be able to have a single topical conversation. However, everyone wants to give it a go, and when they fail, out comes the insults.

That is a badge of honor

Why because most of you are pretty smart (except dry-sand that boy is a box of rocks, and I'm starting to have questions about the Abba guy now too) so, if I can take a topic past the point where it can be legitimately defended and your last course of action is to concede or attack me personally. in my book either action means the same thing.