Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: December 25, 2024, 6:09 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
NC Gov on the wrong side of history......
#1
NC Gov on the wrong side of history......
For those stuck in America, feel free to let NC Gov, and resident asshole, know his bigotry to transgender will not stand.

Here is his twitter page.

https://twitter.com/patmccrorync?lang=en
Reply
#2
RE: NC Gov on the wrong side of history......
(May 10, 2016 at 6:43 am)Brian37 Wrote: For those stuck in America, feel free to let NC Gov, and resident asshole, know his bigotry to transgender will not stand.

Here is his twitter page.

https://twitter.com/patmccrorync?lang=en

Please clarify something for me. When you speak of "transgender" people do you mean only people who have been physically transformed into the opposite sex? Or do you include people who are physically one sex, but identify and dress as the other sex?
Reply
#3
RE: NC Gov on the wrong side of history......
(May 11, 2016 at 3:24 pm)Lek Wrote:
(May 10, 2016 at 6:43 am)Brian37 Wrote: For those stuck in America, feel free to let NC Gov, and resident asshole, know his bigotry to transgender will not stand.

Here is his twitter page.

https://twitter.com/patmccrorync?lang=en

Please clarify something for me.  When you speak of "transgender" people do you mean only people who have been physically transformed into the opposite sex?  Or do you include people who are physically one sex, but identify and dress as the other sex?

Just a little nitpick, being transgender doesn't include 'dressing like' anything.
In every country and every age, the priest had been hostile to Liberty.
- Thomas Jefferson
Reply
#4
RE: NC Gov on the wrong side of history......
(May 11, 2016 at 3:24 pm)Lek Wrote: Please clarify something for me.  When you speak of "transgender" people do you mean only people who have been physically transformed into the opposite sex?  Or do you include people who are physically one sex, but identify and dress as the other sex?

What does it matter?
Even if the open windows of science at first make us shiver after the cozy indoor warmth of traditional humanizing myths, in the end the fresh air brings vigor, and the great spaces have a splendor of their own - Bertrand Russell
Reply
#5
RE: NC Gov on the wrong side of history......
(May 11, 2016 at 3:57 pm)Faith No More Wrote:
(May 11, 2016 at 3:24 pm)Lek Wrote: Please clarify something for me.  When you speak of "transgender" people do you mean only people who have been physically transformed into the opposite sex?  Or do you include people who are physically one sex, but identify and dress as the other sex?

What does it matter?

It matters because if a man thinks he is a woman, but has a penis, why can't he/she use the men's urinal to pee?
Reply
#6
RE: NC Gov on the wrong side of history......
(May 11, 2016 at 3:24 pm)Lek Wrote:
(May 10, 2016 at 6:43 am)Brian37 Wrote: For those stuck in America, feel free to let NC Gov, and resident asshole, know his bigotry to transgender will not stand.

Here is his twitter page.

https://twitter.com/patmccrorync?lang=en

Please clarify something for me.  When you speak of "transgender" people do you mean only people who have been physically transformed into the opposite sex?  Or do you include people who are physically one sex, but identify and dress as the other sex?

Transgender includes everyone who identifies with a different gender to the one assigned at birth, so yes it includes people who have not had SRS. "Transsexual" is sometimes used to describe people who have already had SRS, but "transgender" still applies to them.

However, you can't necessarily tell who has had SRS or not just by looking at them. Most of the secondary sex characterstic (breasts and hips in transwomen, facial and body hair in transmen) are brought on by hormone treatments, not SRS. You can have transgender people who look VERY passable (physically look like the gender they identify as perfectly) who still have their birth genitals.

That's why the "birth genitals" argument for bathroom segregation gets fuzzy and doesn't make sense. You can have transgender men who, with clothes on, you'd never guess wasn't born a man, but still has a vagina. Same for transwomen. Laws like this are suggesting those people should still be made to go into the bathroom based on their genitals, you'd literally have a straight-up woman (from outside appearance anyway) going into mens' bathrooms, and vice versa.
"Adulthood is like looking both ways before you cross the road, and then getting hit by an airplane"  - sarcasm_only

"Ironically like the nativist far-Right, which despises multiculturalism, but benefits from its ideas of difference to scapegoat the other and to promote its own white identity politics; these postmodernists, leftists, feminists and liberals also use multiculturalism, to side with the oppressor, by demanding respect and tolerance for oppression characterised as 'difference', no matter how intolerable."
- Maryam Namazie

Reply
#7
RE: NC Gov on the wrong side of history......
(May 11, 2016 at 4:04 pm)Yeauxleaux Wrote:
(May 11, 2016 at 3:24 pm)Lek Wrote: Please clarify something for me.  When you speak of "transgender" people do you mean only people who have been physically transformed into the opposite sex?  Or do you include people who are physically one sex, but identify and dress as the other sex?

Transgender includes everyone who identifies with a different gender to the one assigned at birth, so yes it includes people who have not had SRS. "Transsexual" is sometimes used to describe people who have already had SRS, but "transgender" still applies to them.

However, you can't necessarily tell who has had SRS or not just by looking at them. Most of the secondary sex characterstic (breasts and hips in transwomen, facial and body hair in transmen) are brought on by hormone treatments, not SRS. You can have transgender people who look VERY passable (physically look like the gender they identify as perfectly) who still have their birth genitals.

That's why the "birth genitals" argument for bathroom segregation gets fuzzy and doesn't make sense. You can have transgender men who, with clothes on, you'd never guess wasn't born a man, but still has a vagina. Same for transwomen. Laws like this are suggesting those people should still be made to go into the bathroom based on their genitals, you'd literally have a straight-up woman (from outside appearance anyway) going into mens' bathrooms, and vice versa.

So it comes down to the comfort of the person involved.
Reply
#8
RE: NC Gov on the wrong side of history......
(May 11, 2016 at 4:03 pm)Lek Wrote: It matters because if a man thinks he is a woman, but has a penis, why can't he/she use the men's urinal to pee?

Because it turns out gender is about much more than what's between your legs.

What harm does it do to you if a person that identifies as a woman but still has a penis uses the women's restroom?
Even if the open windows of science at first make us shiver after the cozy indoor warmth of traditional humanizing myths, in the end the fresh air brings vigor, and the great spaces have a splendor of their own - Bertrand Russell
Reply
#9
RE: NC Gov on the wrong side of history......
(May 11, 2016 at 4:03 pm)Lek Wrote:
(May 11, 2016 at 3:57 pm)Faith No More Wrote: What does it matter?

It matters because if a man thinks he is a woman, but has a penis, why can't he/she use the men's urinal to pee?

Why do you care?
Reply
#10
RE: NC Gov on the wrong side of history......
What if a man who thinks he's a woman, but is dressed like a man wants to go into the women's restroom? Even though he's dressed as a man and has a penis, is he still a woman and thus entitled to used the women's room?
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  What the hell is wrong with people? arewethereyet 64 6820 April 26, 2022 at 11:17 am
Last Post: Fake Messiah
  What's wrong with this? Succubus#2 10 1108 April 11, 2020 at 5:22 am
Last Post: Gawdzilla Sama
  The Coronavirus Is the Worst Intelligence Failure in U.S. History WinterHold 0 380 March 26, 2020 at 2:32 pm
Last Post: WinterHold
  This day in active shooter history..... Brian37 46 5288 February 24, 2019 at 2:18 pm
Last Post: Gawdzilla Sama
  AGW protesters glue themselves to gov energy department (UK) Duty 24 3249 February 17, 2019 at 3:46 pm
Last Post: Duty
  What Could Go Wrong? Minimalist 2 461 August 27, 2018 at 2:29 pm
Last Post: vorlon13
  Tucker Carlson launches "Men In America"... during women's history month Divinity 19 3012 March 10, 2018 at 1:29 pm
Last Post: John V
  Disney Channel is making history with its first gay coming-out story Silver 57 7812 October 28, 2017 at 4:54 pm
Last Post: Rev. Rye
  Wrong Target Minimalist 4 888 October 14, 2017 at 12:58 am
Last Post: Thumpalumpacus
  Leftists Purging History or Al Queda in America Neo-Scholastic 525 154145 August 28, 2017 at 7:10 pm
Last Post: Amarok



Users browsing this thread: 39 Guest(s)