9-11, give me a break.

[Angrboda]

Wow. That was some demonstration!

You're such a clown. I have no interest in having a tit for tat with a 9/11 truther. The river of bullshit is virtually endless.

[BetaOrionis]

Here is a "conspiracy theory video" but just watch the waterfall of glowing metal @:14-16

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cxFXFkN6FaI

And here is a demonstration of molten aluminum poured at 1800 degrees, it turn silver near instantly.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=30OVAvg1aGQ


If the pour of metal out of the building was molten aluminum, it was a hell of a lot hotter than 1800 degree

Rubbish. No chance that is aluminium at 1800F. Might have been 1000F at most. Also, whatever metal was pouring out of the WTC - it certainly wouldn't have been pure aluminum - would be an aluminium alloy that you would likely find in aircraft construction, and would likely be mixed with whatever else was burning at the time. 

Don't pretend the shite you're spouting is forensic science because it isn't. Also, did you actually read the FEMA report that you quoted? It doesn't give any evidence that the steel was melted, and certainly not evaporated. It does indicate the the steel's construction may have been compromised to begin with...

One last thing, eyewitness reports are not proof of anything, ever!

[Angrboda]

Molten aluminum at ~1800 F.

(http://drjudywood.com/articles/why/why_i...l#Thermite)

[Fidel_Castronaut]

Ah, I see it's the annual 'AF.org turns into the 9/11 truth forum' again.

Oh how droll! Look at all the nut job conspiracy fruitcakes. Bless their little cotton socks.

[Thumpalumpacus]

A video and transcript of his detailed lecture arguing controlled demolition as cause for collapse can be downloaded here. Or his power-point presentation with audio can be downloaded here

I'm not interested. It wasn't a demolition, and I'm not going to waste my data plan on watching that.

Now, if you're able to explain in your own words how you think three demo crews could wire three buildings housing tens of thousands of workers without being noticed by the janitors, the food service crews, the HVAC, I'm all ears.

Unless you think they were in on it too.

Gosh, your conspiracy keeps getting bigger!

[Thumpalumpacus]

Oh, so we finally took the first turn into Alex Jones LaLa land to derail this thread completely. No big loss but hilarious that after 15 years this bullshit is still going strong.

Oh sorry, did I derail the 9/11 rant thread with actual forensic science?

lol, no. You did derail it with silly claims, though.

[abaris]

lol, no. You did derail it with silly claims, though.

´
QFT.

[Crossless2.0]

A video and transcript of his detailed lecture arguing controlled demolition as cause for collapse can be downloaded here. Or his power-point presentation with audio can be downloaded here

I'm not interested. It wasn't a demolition, and I'm not going to waste my data plan on watching that.

Now, if you're able to explain in your own words how you think three demo crews could wire three buildings housing tens of thousands of workers without being noticed by the janitors, the food service crews, the HVAC, I'm all ears.

Unless you think they were in on it too.

Gosh, your conspiracy keeps getting bigger!

Yes, this is getting ridiculous, and perhaps it's time I put a stop to it.

It was me. I brought down the buildings.

I also delivered Obama in Kenya. And I was the photographer for the Apollo moon landing hoax.

[Huggy Bear]

Tell me, physics lady...at what temperature does steel become molten and runny?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OmuzyWC60eE

Tell me how you know the molten material is steel and not aluminum?

It's unreasonable to assume otherwise seeing how aluminum is 3 times more expensive than steel. IMO You really would only use aluminum in the place of steel if you needed to save weight, but then I don't know a whole lot when it come to building skyscrapers so who knows?

Was 9 11 a conspiracy? Who knows? I know one thing, you'll never find answers if you're not willing to ask questions.

Tell me what you guys think of this news report.

https://m.youtube.com/?#/watch?v=8X5bNIzq8t4

[Arkilogue]

Ah, I see it's the annual 'AF.org turns into the 9/11 truth forum' again.

Oh how droll! Look at all the nut job conspiracy fruitcakes. Bless their little cotton socks.

Don't worry, I'm done posting in here for now.

But I would certainly hope you all will be interested in Dr. Hulsey's further scientific findings. Because he repeatedly found the NIST's conclusions and model grossly negligent. He was asked as a professor would he accept the NIST account? He said no, he'd flunk the student.

The NIST computer model did not include a great many of the connections present in the actual building, it did not model full collapse and the part of the collapse it did model showed deformations not present in the actual collapse.

And as you are all so thankfully committed to hardcore science, that alone should raise some serious red flags.

Peace.