Posts: 67144
Threads: 140
Joined: June 28, 2011
Reputation:
162
RE: Scientific evidence of God by an atheist (Where mankind is one likely type of God)
November 9, 2016 at 2:44 pm
(November 9, 2016 at 2:15 pm)FatAndFaithless Wrote: This reads like it's written by a copy-paste program with veiled chatbot insults.
Exactly, we just need a large enough data set to make that determination. Gotta keep him posting.
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
Posts: 28269
Threads: 522
Joined: June 16, 2015
Reputation:
90
RE: Scientific evidence of God by an atheist (Where mankind is one likely type of God)
November 9, 2016 at 5:45 pm
(November 9, 2016 at 2:44 pm)Rhythm Wrote: (November 9, 2016 at 2:15 pm)FatAndFaithless Wrote: This reads like it's written by a copy-paste program with veiled chatbot insults.
Exactly, we just need a large enough data set to make that determination. Gotta keep him posting.
But it's kinda like kicking a puppy.
Being told you're delusional does not necessarily mean you're mental.
Posts: 354
Threads: 9
Joined: November 1, 2016
Reputation:
1
RE: Scientific evidence of God by an atheist (Where mankind is one likely type of God)
November 9, 2016 at 10:23 pm
(This post was last modified: November 9, 2016 at 10:28 pm by ProgrammingGodJordan.)
(November 9, 2016 at 2:44 pm)Rhythm Wrote: (November 9, 2016 at 2:15 pm)FatAndFaithless Wrote: This reads like it's written by a copy-paste program with veiled chatbot insults.
Exactly, we just need a large enough data set to make that determination. Gotta keep him posting.
Sufficient streams of expression persist, midst the original post.
(November 9, 2016 at 5:45 pm)mh.brewer Wrote: (November 9, 2016 at 2:44 pm)Rhythm Wrote: Exactly, we just need a large enough data set to make that determination. Gotta keep him posting.
But it's kinda like kicking a puppy.
I had, four years prior, naively (albeit logically) axiomatized consciousness, amidst an equation. See "Consciencia_Aequatio".
Therein, for any computational system observed, there exists some non-polynomially computable function [on planck-einsteinian relation].
Thereafter, existence is uniformly distributed at the boundary of said asymptote; therein, asymptotical indifference (amidst existence's constituents) persists.
As such, inferiority is but inconsequential/asymptotically inexistent.
Therein, puppies, together with humans are but uniformly bound...
Posts: 28269
Threads: 522
Joined: June 16, 2015
Reputation:
90
RE: Scientific evidence of God by an atheist (Where mankind is one likely type of God)
November 9, 2016 at 10:37 pm
(November 9, 2016 at 10:23 pm)ProgrammingGodJordan Wrote: (November 9, 2016 at 2:44 pm)Rhythm Wrote: Exactly, we just need a large enough data set to make that determination. Gotta keep him posting.
Sufficient streams of expression persist, midst the original post.
(November 9, 2016 at 5:45 pm)mh.brewer Wrote: But it's kinda like kicking a puppy.
I had, four years prior, naively (albeit logically) axiomatized consciousness, amidst an equation. See "Consciencia_Aequatio".
Therein, for any computational system observed, there exists some non-polynomially computable function [on planck-einsteinian relation].
Thereafter, existence is uniformly distributed at the boundary of said asymptote; therein, asymptotical indifference (amidst existence's constituents) persists.
As such, inferiority is but inconsequential/asymptotically inexistent.
Therein, puppies, together with humans are but uniformly bound...
I'm sorry, What? I didn't quite catch that. Could you repeat please?
Being told you're delusional does not necessarily mean you're mental.
Posts: 67144
Threads: 140
Joined: June 28, 2011
Reputation:
162
RE: Scientific evidence of God by an atheist (Where mankind is one likely type of God)
November 10, 2016 at 12:00 am
(This post was last modified: November 10, 2016 at 12:02 am by The Grand Nudger.)
(November 9, 2016 at 10:23 pm)ProgrammingGodJordan Wrote: (November 9, 2016 at 2:44 pm)Rhythm Wrote: Exactly, we just need a large enough data set to make that determination. Gotta keep him posting.
Sufficient streams of expression persist, midst the original post.
Waffles!
Blue try field dog I, then?
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
Posts: 354
Threads: 9
Joined: November 1, 2016
Reputation:
1
RE: Scientific evidence of God by an atheist (Where mankind is one likely type of God)
November 10, 2016 at 12:22 am
(This post was last modified: November 10, 2016 at 12:38 am by ProgrammingGodJordan.)
(November 10, 2016 at 12:00 am)Rhythm Wrote: (November 9, 2016 at 10:23 pm)ProgrammingGodJordan Wrote: Sufficient streams of expression persist, midst the original post.
Waffles!
Blue try field dog I, then?
You possess billions of neurons, and trillions of synapses.
You are thusly God-capable, as is any regularly-bound human. [of reasonable financial description]
However, starkly, you perturb your neurons, such that said neurons are apparently, of minimal use/value...
Posts: 67144
Threads: 140
Joined: June 28, 2011
Reputation:
162
RE: Scientific evidence of God by an atheist (Where mankind is one likely type of God)
November 10, 2016 at 12:24 am
(This post was last modified: November 10, 2016 at 12:24 am by The Grand Nudger.)
Non sequitur, start from O.
Stonecrab, tilt.....if wanderer why.
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
Posts: 354
Threads: 9
Joined: November 1, 2016
Reputation:
1
RE: Scientific evidence of God by an atheist (Where mankind is one likely type of God)
November 10, 2016 at 12:37 am
(This post was last modified: November 10, 2016 at 12:42 am by ProgrammingGodJordan.)
(November 10, 2016 at 12:24 am)Rhythm Wrote: Non sequitur, start from O.
Stonecrab, tilt.....if wanderer why.
[*A*]
Sufficient streams of expression persist, midst the original post.
[*B*]
You possess billions of neurons, and trillions of synapses.
You are thusly God-capable, as is any regularly-bound human. [of reasonable financial description]
However, starkly, you perturb your neurons, such that said neurons are apparently, of minimal use/value...
[*C*]
The absence of research amidst critical topics, amidst thine, [ie machine learning, physics] shall likely fashion errors amidst observational abilities of thine.
Observe areas of focus, of mine:
(0) NEWTONIAN PERTURBATION en Calculus II integration, via Trigonometry. See 'Trigonometric Rule Collapser Set'. [An ENHANCEMENT of mine, of Newtonian Calculus, particularly abound Trigonometric Integration]
(1) I have composed non trivial models, SAMPLE: (utilizing residual neural network) for heart irregularity detection. (Deriving 76/500+ via international kaggle scale) {{See 'EJECTION-FRACTION-IRREGULARITY-DETECTION-MODEL.'}}
(2) A.... n fold orthographic quasicrystal-structured neural network scan behaviour pattern routine that manifests as a new type of tri dimensional artificial intelligence scan behaviour algorithm. {{See 'MORPHING-SOMATIC-QUASICRYSTAL-NEURAL-NETWORK'}}
(3) Hypothesis/Initial Implementation of non trivial general neural fabric, {{on the horizon of deep reinforcement learning, mathematics qua quantum computing, and causal learning (uetorch tower blocks)}} See 'THOUGHT CURVATURE'.
[*D*]
Therein, what is your profession's nature?
Have you fulfilled at minimum, secondary education?
Posts: 2009
Threads: 2
Joined: October 8, 2012
Reputation:
26
RE: Scientific evidence of God by an atheist (Where mankind is one likely type of God)
November 10, 2016 at 12:46 am
Do we have a big enough sample to render a verdict yet?
Posts: 354
Threads: 9
Joined: November 1, 2016
Reputation:
1
RE: Scientific evidence of God by an atheist (Where mankind is one likely type of God)
November 10, 2016 at 2:42 am
(This post was last modified: November 10, 2016 at 2:45 am by ProgrammingGodJordan.)
(November 10, 2016 at 12:46 am)LostLocke Wrote: Do we have a big enough sample to render a verdict yet?
This forum's responders (not of my being), are likely absent profound thought cycles.
I shall thereafter seek the God-bound, elsewhere.
![[Image: sVr55ug.png]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=i.imgur.com%2FsVr55ug.png)
Until another space in time...
|
