Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 16, 2024, 1:03 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Theist ➤ Why ☠ Evolution is not Scientific ✔
RE: Theist ➤ Why ☠ Evolution is not Scientific ✔
(November 23, 2016 at 10:47 am)RozKek Wrote: Joker, you're allowed to post(exceptions to 30/30).... as long as it's relevant to the discussion.

Well, if you can't watch an hour of those videos, then at least watch 7mins of this video, ex evolutionist professor now creationist.



Reply
RE: Theist ➤ Why ☠ Evolution is not Scientific ✔
(November 24, 2016 at 3:07 pm)The Joker Wrote: Ken Ham is no fool, he is the Speaker, Author, President, CEO, and Founder of Answers in Genesis.

Now you're just making fun of us.
"Well, evolution is a theory. It is also a fact. And facts and theories are different things, not rungs in a hierarchy of increasing certainty. Facts are the world's data. Theories are structures of ideas that explain and interpret facts. Facts don't go away when scientists debate rival theories to explain them. Einstein's theory of gravitation replaced Newton's in this century, but apples didn't suspend themselves in midair, pending the outcome. And humans evolved from ape- like ancestors whether they did so by Darwin's proposed mechanism or by some other yet to be discovered."

-Stephen Jay Gould
Reply
RE: Theist ➤ Why ☠ Evolution is not Scientific ✔
Or you could read the work of literally thousands of normal scientists and their peer-reviewed papers in the scientific literature rather than trot out less than a handful of creationist scientists.
Reply
RE: Theist ➤ Why ☠ Evolution is not Scientific ✔
No one's going to spend time watching your stupid videos Joker. If you can't make the point yourself then don't bother.

I write genetic algorithms based on the principles of Darwinian evolution. If evolution did not work then my algorithms wouldn't work. They do work. They're very useful. The theory is sound and what's more they pass the ultimate test in that they are useful. Therefore I know from first hand experience that you're talking shite.

If the theory of evolution was incorrect then gene therapy wouldn't work. It does work so we know again from first hand experience that you're talking shite.

Just look at how a new child takes after both their parents. The evidence is plain to see. Humans have been breeding animals for a very long time now. They've been using evolution in practice. They would not be able to do this if evolution did not occur.

The best test for any theory is whether it is actually useful in the real world.
Reply
RE: Theist ➤ Why ☠ Evolution is not Scientific ✔
(November 23, 2016 at 8:23 am)Mathilda Wrote:
(November 23, 2016 at 8:08 am)chimp3 Wrote: Joker: If humans are unique creations then why do we have nipples? Why breast milk for feeding our babies? Why do we have fur and not feathers? Why do we have umbilici?

Why do men have more nostril hair than women? (seriously)


We are more inclined to channel our inner mustache?
Reply
RE: Theist ➤ Why ☠ Evolution is not Scientific ✔
In my case it's because I inhale while diving.
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist.  This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair.  Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second.  That means there's a situation vacant.'
Reply
RE: Theist ➤ Why ☠ Evolution is not Scientific ✔
(November 24, 2016 at 6:32 pm)The Joker Wrote:
(November 23, 2016 at 10:47 am)RozKek Wrote: Joker, you're allowed to post(exceptions to 30/30).... as long as it's relevant to the discussion.

Well, if you can't watch an hour of those videos, then at least watch 7mins of this video, ex evolutionist professor now creationist.






Sigh seen this video already and really that's your big refutation pathetic  Dodgy

And who cares if he used to believe in evolution but doesn't now there are ex creationists too .Changing ones mind does not imply that the thing you have changed your mind to is right .Just about every other person on this site is an ex theist so it's meaningless .


Oh and please drop the evolutionist nonsense there no such 

And lastly as math points out it always amazes me that creationists ignore the literal thousands of scientist who accept evolution (hell 1000 named steve alone) and the mountain of peer reviewed work they have done. And present a handful of holdouts as if there some kind of counter weight. But it doesn't matter really because science is about the method and the evidence not the scientists.
Seek strength, not to be greater than my brother, but to fight my greatest enemy -- myself.

Inuit Proverb

Reply
RE: Theist ➤ Why ☠ Evolution is not Scientific ✔
Did this troll address the following point yet:

So what if it's not scientific?

I mean it is, obviously, but even if it's not, who gives a shit? Atheists don't base their moral actions on TToE. Well, the sane ones don't. The only people this question would matter to is fundamentalists, trying to cling to their fairy tale. To everyone else, it would be a case of, "Whoops! Let's start again."
Feel free to send me a private message.
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists.

Index of useful threads and discussions
Index of my best videos
Quickstart guide to the forum
Reply
RE: Theist ➤ Why ☠ Evolution is not Scientific ✔
(November 25, 2016 at 2:52 am)robvalue Wrote: Did this troll address the following point yet:

So what if it's not scientific?

I mean it is, obviously, but even if it's not, who gives a shit? Atheists don't base their moral actions on TToE. Well, the sane ones don't. The only people this question would matter to is fundamentalists, trying to cling to their fairy tale. To everyone else, it would be a case of, "Whoops! Let's start again."

If evolution didn't happen, then how come we are all here?
Reply
RE: Theist ➤ Why ☠ Evolution is not Scientific ✔
Original post plagarises Kent Hovind, with joker trying to pass Hovind's words off as his own. Original text can be found at http://www.apologeet.nl/evolutie-scheppi...WzJMLFIo9A
Urbs Antiqua Fuit Studiisque Asperrima Belli

Home
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Fine Tuning Principle: Devastating Disproof and Scientific Refutation of Atheism. Nishant Xavier 97 10930 September 20, 2023 at 1:31 pm
Last Post: Silver
  Why did Communists promote Evolution? Nishant Xavier 318 25405 September 7, 2023 at 5:48 pm
Last Post: Simon Moon
  Is Atheism a Religion? Why or why not? Nishant Xavier 91 7186 August 6, 2023 at 1:38 pm
Last Post: LinuxGal
  The fascinating asymmetry of theist-atheist discussion Astreja 5 640 July 22, 2023 at 8:02 pm
Last Post: Thumpalumpacus
  I'm no longer an anti-theist Duty 27 2884 September 16, 2022 at 1:08 pm
Last Post: Angrboda
  I received a letter from a theist, need a good reply Radamand 22 2661 March 22, 2022 at 10:56 pm
Last Post: Ferrocyanide
  Why do theist often drop the letter s when referring to atheists? I_am_not_mafia 56 14058 August 23, 2018 at 4:20 pm
Last Post: Neo-Scholastic
Tongue Disproving Odin - An Experiment in arguing with a theist with Theist logic Cecelia 983 180670 June 6, 2018 at 2:11 pm
Last Post: Raven Orlock
  Why was Newton a theist? Alexmahone 65 14669 March 24, 2018 at 12:39 pm
Last Post: Jehanne
  Why America is anti-theist. Goosebump 3 1275 March 1, 2018 at 9:06 am
Last Post: mlmooney89



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)