new "Cult of 'Non-Beliefism' " aka (the state of being "unlocked")

[robvalue]

Yes, so, as I said, it's the same position with different definitions. You are using one definition only, and I may say, religiously. You're ignoring the second definition, even in your own screenshot, plus other well known informal ones that people regularly use.

I'm going to give up now.

[ProgrammingGodJordan]

Yes, so, as I said, it's the same position with different definitions. You are using one definition only, and I may say, religiously. You're ignoring the second definition, even in your own screenshot, plus other well known informal ones that people regularly use.

I'm going to give up now.

(1)

Ironically, it seems you didn't observe said alternate definitions.
Universally, said definitions compound on 'truth'/ABSOLUTENESS/TOTALITY.
Ergo, articles/analysis sequences of mine comprise on said universal distribution, of large frequency. 

Albeit:



.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.

(2)
★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★

By extension, recall that one's belief may compound on NON-SCIENCE/NONSENSE.
Logic/science in contrast, compounds not, on NON-SCIENCE.

And thus, it is illogical to attempt belief.

By extension, whether or not one believes in gravity for example, is irrelevant, as gravity holds regardless of belief.

Therein, we observe belief's redundancy.

.
.
.

POST SCRIPTUM:
I had long mentioned the aforementioned, amidst the linked articles.

[AceBoogie]

This is the type of crazy where he tells you you're stupid for not understanding what the fuck he's talking about.

Definitely an interesting addition to the forum.

I guess.

[Thumpalumpacus]

No matter what you think about Programming_God Jordan, he provides outstanding entertainment value.

I agree.

Of course I have no belief in his entertainment value one way or the other.

I myself don't have beliefs. UNLIKE THOSE SILLY BELIEFISTS

Hence the phrase, "no matter what you think", because if you have no beliefs, you're not thinking, silly.

---

Albeit, although we do things probabilistically, absent belief, attempting to believe/regard things as true/absolute likely induces that one select sub-optimal probabilities.

Leaving aside the Chopraesque bullshit, I gotta tell you -- if you're going to insist on using unusual words, do it well. I now know you've read the word "albeit", and I now know you're not worried about using it in an Internet post -- but I also know you don't know WTF it means, given the redundancy at the beginning of the quoted sentence.

This leads me to believe that you're pretty big on gussying things up in order to sound smarter than you actually are. As a result, your message gets undermined.

Programming god? Perhaps. Linguistic knave? Almost certainly.

Communicate your thoughts clearly, or up your dosage of Risperdol.

[chimp3]

I started watching  Mr Robot last night. Some binge watching is in store for me this weekend.

[ProgrammingGodJordan]

Leaving aside the Chopraesque bullshit, I gotta tell you -- if you're going to insist on using unusual words, do it well. I now know you've read the word "albeit", and I now know you're not worried about using it in an Internet post -- but I also know you don't know WTF it means, given the redundancy at the beginning of the quoted sentence.

This leads me to believe that you're pretty big on gussying things up in order to sound smarter than you actually are. As a result, your message gets undermined.

Programming god? Perhaps. Linguistic knave? Almost certainly.

Communicate your thoughts clearly, or up your dosage of Risperdol.

(1)
Beliefs are quite the likely danger.
Perhaps it is pertinent that you discard that of the entirety of the beliefs of thine.

Albeit, I have but provided 'simplified' sequences, amidst the linked urls.
By extension, I am quite the intellect. [Observe my signature]

.
.
.

(2)

[FatAndFaithless]

I believe you're a moron.

[ProgrammingGodJordan]

I believe you're a moron.

Why?

[FatAndFaithless]

I believe you're a moron.

Why?

*Gestures to the previous 8 pages*

[Angrboda]

It's another time cube guy.