Login

**Minimalist** · June 29, 2011 at 7:51 pm

First you'd have to demonstrate that there was a flood.

I'd settle for the precursor of dogs ( wolves) with a T-Rex but you can't come up with that either.

Statler Waldorf · June 29, 2011 at 7:57 pm

(June 29, 2011 at 7:51 pm)Minimalist Wrote: I'd settle for the precursor of dogs ( wolves) with a T-Rex but you can't come up with that either.

Nor would I expect to, the creation model does not predict T rex and wolf fossils to be found side by side.

DaveD · June 29, 2011 at 8:04 pm

Which creation model, there are so many, depending on the requirements of the creationist at any given time.

Statler Waldorf · June 29, 2011 at 8:23 pm

(June 29, 2011 at 8:04 pm)DaveD Wrote: Which creation model, there are so many, depending on the requirements of the creationist at any given time.

There are probably even more evolutionary models, but there is a general theory that the majority of evolutionists ascribe to just like there is a current creation model that the majority of creationists ascribe to.

Epimethean · June 29, 2011 at 8:33 pm

Round and round we go ...

Statler Waldorf · June 29, 2011 at 8:43 pm

(June 29, 2011 at 8:33 pm)Epimethean Wrote: Round and round we go ...

Not my fault, you guys keep trying to refute things that creationists do not even believe. Then when I point this out you guys always ask what the current model is. The next day you refute something that creationists do not believe, so I point it out again.....and it just keeps going.....the only way to stop it is to actually try and argue against what creationists believe right? Smile

Epimethean · June 29, 2011 at 8:56 pm

There is zero evidence for creation (of an exclusive sort which creationists have not recently borrowed from science in order to finance their bankrupt model). There was no flood. There was no exodus.

Statler Waldorf · June 29, 2011 at 9:03 pm

(June 29, 2011 at 8:56 pm)Epimethean Wrote: There is zero evidence for creation (of an exclusive sort which creationists have not recently borrowed from science in order to finance their bankrupt model). There was no flood. There was no exodus.

More assertions I see. Not so sure you are qualified to make such a statement though considering you have proven time and time again you are not familiar with the current creation model, so thereofre you also have to be unfamiliar with the evidence it is built upon.

DaveD · June 29, 2011 at 9:06 pm

Now's your chance then. Present the evidence...........

Epimethean · June 29, 2011 at 9:08 pm

Every time someone asks you for the "current" creation model (which still and ludicrously posits the earth's age at less than 10,000 years), you do a song and dance. WHAT current creation model? Whose?

Login
Username:
Password:	Lost Password?
	Remember me

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread		Author	Replies	Views	Last Post
	On the lunacy of prayer	slartibartfast	100	9116	October 12, 2021 at 12:17 am Last Post: slartibartfast
	Global Prayer To End Atheism	Silver	60	9873	August 25, 2021 at 8:20 am Last Post: Brian37
	[Serious] Care to Seriously Consider the Existance of a Creator (God)?	theMadJW	117	15376	April 29, 2020 at 12:40 pm Last Post: polymath257
	A prayer to God ...	ignoramus	10	1446	May 3, 2019 at 11:17 am Last Post: The Grand Nudger
	Why We don't take your Holy Scriptures Seriously	vulcanlogician	75	9730	October 25, 2018 at 5:15 pm Last Post: Minimalist
	Question about prayer.	purplepurpose	27	6971	October 4, 2018 at 2:06 pm Last Post: Drich
	What do you think prayer is?	vulcanlogician	44	7317	February 2, 2018 at 4:12 pm Last Post: emjay
	Can prayer change God's perfect plan?	MellisaClarke	217	72810	May 23, 2017 at 8:33 am Last Post: SteveII
	Prayer	Athena777	181	21428	December 13, 2016 at 12:38 pm Last Post: Asmodee
	You must seek something else, or something is seriously wrong with you	WinterHold	23	4124	August 7, 2016 at 7:52 am Last Post: chimp3