Who Says

[The Grand Nudger]

The "I may be A Idiot, but you guys are potty mouths!" defense.  



I guess it never occurs to the religious that their hatespeech-as-piety sounds alot like profanity to everyone else.

[Whateverist]

If you only have one male and female of a single species then that species will die out because it lacks genetic diversity to produce healthy off-spring.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minimum_viable_population

Not pertinent to your point but I'm surprised if there is any certainty regarding the viability of a species continuing from only one couple.  Of course it would be greatly diminished as a species and the likelihood that it would retain a resistant population for any of a number of recurrent diseases would be mighty slim.  Still it seems like a crap shoot rather than a null.  But, since I don't know the bible, I don't assume I know it all.

[Succubus]

Yep. I've never been anything other than an atheist, even before I knew there was a word for it. The whole gods and worship thing is just too ridiculous to me even to be childish.

I was about six or seven years when I spotted the first of many plot holes in the story, it became a fascinating way to pass time in religious lessons. I asked one of the carmelite bastards a question only a kid would ask, but still a pertinent question today; 'Sister Mary Clair, if the devil makes people naughty the why doesn’t god kill him'. Her eyes went as wide as dinner plates and emitted gamma rays; You're to young to understand!
She either didn't know or she was lying, at seven years old I realised the story of Christianity was a complete crock.

[Astreja]

The "I may be A Idiot, but you guys are potty mouths!" defense.  



I guess it never occurs to the religious that their hatespeech-as-piety sounds alot like profanity to everyone else.

Agree.  Being told that I'm so evil that I must accept a proxy human sacrifice to avoid eternal torture actually crosses the line from profanity into verbal and psychological abuse.

[Fireball]

Yep. I've never been anything other than an atheist, even before I knew there was a word for it. The whole gods and worship thing is just too ridiculous to me even to be childish.

Concerning religion:

[Ravenshire]

Actually it's because everyone knows that you don't ever understand the reasons why your arguments can be easily refuted and so can't be reasoned with. Theists like you serve to act like wounded prey being given to newly hatched atheists to practise on.

 You nor anyone else has ever defeated anything presented from scripture. Those newly hatched atheist you are speaking of mostly use bad language and senseless talk to make an impression on the older atheist here, and you guys fall for it and defend such drivel. Shame on you for lowering yourself to such a level.

GC

Scripture has never made a coherent argument that needs defeating. It's all self defeating except to the blind, the gullible and the willfully ignorant.

[Godscreated]

 I see the only reason atheist jump on my spelling is because it's the only argument they have against what I've said. I hardly ever see atheist correcting each others spelling and everyone here knows that is true. I've seen atheist here misspelling words all the time and I say nothing about it, why, because I make the effort to figure out what was intended and usually can. I do not see that it's important to call out people for misspelling words or using the wrong word such as I did with the word meat instead of meet. Really if I can figure out what others are saying despite their misspelled words those who claim their superior spelling ability should easily be able, too. Like I said to begin with I see people who point out others misspellings and offer no other argument to a post are without an argument. I don't mind being corrected it helps me to improve and I have, what I mind is the superior attitude that's used in such correction. I know my own weaknesses it's why I try and look up any word I have doubt about spelling it.

GC

That doesn't answer my question. If I don't point out your spelling errors, are you going to point out that I didn't point out your spelling errors, like you did in the post that prompted my question? Yes or no would cover it.

I'm not sure what post you are speaking of.

GC

---

 You nor anyone else has ever defeated anything presented from scripture. Those newly hatched atheist you are speaking of mostly use bad language and senseless talk to make an impression on the older atheist here, and you guys fall for it and defend such drivel. Shame on you for lowering yourself to such a level.

GC

Defeated anything from scripture? I could say that you haven't defeated anything from Lord of the Rings. Both are works of fiction. Yet you are making an assumption that we do not, that scripture isn't fiction. There is no reason to believe that scripture is anything other than made up nonsense, and plenty of reason to believe that it is.

You know your own particular brand of fiction like a true fan boy and can only make strawman arguments against evidence based science because you don't understand what you are arguing against.

All that's false, period.

GC

[Thumpalumpacus]

Could you please clarify whether you do or don't want us to point out your spelling mistakes? Because if you're going to complain when no one points them out, I'm not going to do you the disservice of not pointing them out anymore.

 I see the only reason atheist jump on my spelling is because it's the only argument they have against what I've said. I hardly ever see atheist correcting each others spelling and everyone here knows that is true. I've seen atheist here misspelling words all the time and I say nothing about it, why, because I make the effort to figure out what was intended and usually can. I do not see that it's important to call out people for misspelling words or using the wrong word such as I did with the word meat instead of meet. Really if I can figure out what others are saying despite their misspelled words those who claim their superior spelling ability should easily be able, too. Like I said to begin with I see people who point out others misspellings and offer no other argument to a post are without an argument. I don't mind being corrected it helps me to improve and I have, what I mind is the superior attitude that's used in such correction. I know my own weaknesses it's why I try and look up any word I have doubt about spelling it.

GC

I don't correct your misspellings, but I do address your points.

Oddly enough, you reply to me very rarely.

My takeaway is that you'd rather find fault in the behavior of others rather than answer questions. So now I not only ignore your misspellings, but your points as well.

Perhaps if you quit whining about little stuff and replied to more important things, you'd swing a bigger bat. Just sayin'.

[Minimalist]

4 b in your quiz is wrong, Charlie D matriculated and got his D Theo and swore in as an Anglican minister prior to getting on that silly little boat.

And yet he overcame that handicap and wrote a book which causes creatards to scratch their nuts until they bleed.  Good work, Chuck.

[Amarok]

I'm not sure what post you are speaking of.

Not our problem

All that's false, period.

All true ,Period