Conservatives have more self-control

[John V]

What truth? The truth is that, from either a religious or atheist view, women were made so that they could be dominated by men. Attempts to bypass that truth result in negative population growth and the eventual demise of the species.

Do you have children?

Yes, three.

[Minimalist]

You're sorta repulsive, alpha.

Nah.  He's just a trump-class shitball.

[Tiberius]

Conservatives have more self-control

...apart from when it comes to creating multiple threads about why conservatives are better than liberals apparently...

[Thumpalumpacus]

It makes perfect sense ... how? This is an utter non sequitur.

What part don't you understand?

The part where you insinuate that the male domination of females is a requirement for human evolutionary success.

May I suggest perhaps quit trying to toss around fancy words and instead think your way through your thicket next time? It'll serve you in good stead.

May I suggest that you don't get condescending after putting forth a cheap and obvious false dichotomy?

Nah, condescension looks good on you. When you post points worthy of respect, you'll get it.

Do you have children?

Yes, three.

And was rape necessary to sire any of them?

[John V]

The part where you insinuate that the male domination of females is a requirement for human evolutionary success.

I haven't argued that at all, and particularly not in the part you quoted, which regarded a Biblical, not evolutionary, perspective.

And was rape necessary to sire any of them?

Not at all. Yet another cheap false dichotomy.

[Whateverist]

Next thread by First-in-his-own-mind: Why Conservatards are just plain the best!

[John V]

Next thread by First-in-his-own-mind:  Why Conservatards are just plain the best!

Mmmm... liberal tears...

[Whateverist]

You wish. Go ahead say some more funny things. Rik can't provide for all the levity around here.

[Thumpalumpacus]

And was rape necessary to sire any of them?

Not at all. Yet another cheap false dichotomy.

Perhaps you should think twice before arguing that forcible sex is why humans display sexual dimorphism, then. Because that is your argument -- or did you forget that already?

Of course, asking you to think through the implications of something ... long shot, I know ...

Now, before you answer, reread your own words. I've added emphasis to help you with your comprehension:

What truth? The truth is that, from either a religious or atheist view, women were made so that they could be dominated by men. Attempts to bypass that truth result in negative population growth and the eventual demise of the species.

Are you here refuting this claim you made? Your incoherence is startling.

[John V]

Are you alleging a contradiction between the two quotes? If so, what is it? As it stands, that post doesn't have a coherent point.