Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 26, 2024, 2:42 am
Thread Rating:
We may have different points of view but can we still be friends?
|
I call myself a "pragmatic libertarian", and I'm pretty centrist these days. I find most libertarians are anarchists who don't like the 'a' word. Libertarianism and anarchism are incompatible though. Libertarians still believe in the benefits of government, they just don't think the government should be too overbearing.
My take is you should expand the role of government if you can demonstrate an overwhelming benefit for society by doing so. This is why I support universal healthcare. I'm fine sacrificing some liberty if it means that poor people won't die or go bankrupt because life dealt them a bad hand.
One man's overwhelming is another man's overbearing.
RE: We may have different points of view but can we still be friends?
May 29, 2018 at 6:34 pm
(This post was last modified: May 29, 2018 at 6:41 pm by Edwardo Piet.)
(May 29, 2018 at 1:44 pm)CapnAwesome Wrote:(May 29, 2018 at 1:36 pm)Edwardo Piet Wrote: They're both anti-authority too I can't smoke. It burns my throat so I refuse to do it and I can't do what I refuse to do. (May 29, 2018 at 3:18 pm)Tiberius Wrote: This is why I support universal healthcare. I'm fine sacrificing some liberty if it means that poor people won't die or go bankrupt because life dealt them a bad hand. I agree that that is just. But I guess I don't consider the 'freedom' to have more than others so they are worse off and less free than yourself to be a freedom. I consider freedom to be an entirely good thing so if that freedom hurts others it's not good anymore so it's not freedom anymore. I definitely reserve the word "freedom" for good things. Like freedom of speech, freedom of property, etc. Freedom to violate or harm isn't something I'd call freedom. I mean, sure, one way of looking at it is that technically it's freedom because there are good freedoms and bad freedoms. But then again, if you're violating the freedom of others with your freedom, is being pro that really pro freedom? So, I wouldn't say that being against the freedom to harm or violate the freedom of others makes me any less liberal. After all, when you violate the freedom of others you may be promoting your freedom but you're violating theirs... so how would that be pro freedom? Quote:I'm a Libertarian, don't worry thought I'm not crazy I just prefer less government. Why? Are you a billionaire who thinks he can run roughshod over all the little people? RE: We may have different points of view but can we still be friends?
May 30, 2018 at 10:43 pm
(This post was last modified: May 30, 2018 at 10:45 pm by Cecelia.)
I used to be a libertarian. Then I found the Green Party and was much happier. I'm too pro-public schools to be a libertarian. Not to mention pro-welfare.
I do, however, think the government needs to stop incarcerating people over drug usage. (Of course the private prison system and for-profit colleges are a big part of why I'm not a libertarian anymore)
The whole tone of Church teaching in regard to woman is, to the last degree, contemptuous and degrading. - Elizabeth Cady Stanton
(May 30, 2018 at 10:43 pm)Cecelia Wrote: I used to be a libertarian. Then I found the Green Party and was much happier. The green party in NZ has a defence policy to build a big hedge around the country. Not quite true, but one of their policies is to disband, or greatly reduce the military. Playing Cluedo with my mum while I was at Uni: "You did WHAT? With WHO? WHERE???" |
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)