Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 23, 2024, 12:21 pm
Thread Rating:
|
DNA Proves Existence of a Designer
|
 (November 13, 2018 at 10:33 am)Grandizer Wrote:(November 13, 2018 at 10:30 am)Peebo-Thuhlu Wrote: All hail Lord Stan! Wait! Where am I going? Why am I in this hand-basket?   Not at work.  (November 13, 2018 at 7:08 am)Pandæmonium Wrote:(November 13, 2018 at 6:51 am)IWNKYAAIMI Wrote: Quick.. Lock the thread. Maybe you all can make an exception and take a member vote? Pretty please? With sugar on top? Disclaimer: I am only responsible for what I say, not what you choose to understand.
Noooooooooo!
Disclaimer: I am only responsible for what I say, not what you choose to understand.
Next milestone 1,000 pages.
Bucky Ball
badass messiah  Religious Views: Igtheist .. there is no coherent definition of the word "god" RE: DNA Proves Existence of a Designer
November 13, 2018 at 11:50 am
(This post was last modified: November 13, 2018 at 11:51 am by Bucky Ball.)
(November 13, 2018 at 2:57 am)Everena Wrote: That's fantastic. No one is saying evolution is not true. We are saying the complex code of DNA did not create itself. Neither one of you are competent to say anything about how genetic processes arose. You assertions are dismissed for the rubbish they are. Quote:Additionally true love with your soulmate/other half is the only thing in the whole world that really matters and to me is our whole reason for being. God is not even a close second. Interesting ... how Hollywoody. Just like you waked out of a old Jane Austin novel. I b'lieve I have the vapours ... I need some smelling salts. Now get in the kitchen and make me a sandwich like a woman should. Quote:In regards to my experiences, just let it go. I know what I experienced, I am a huge skeptic of everything and this went well beyond any and all doubt for me or I would not be so sure of it. I had mutual/shared experiences verified on the spot (including the making love experience) and so many other signs that I have no doubts left at all and I am 100% sure that God and eternal life are truths. I however do not expect you to take my word for it. You need to have your own experiences in order to prove it to yourself beyond any doubt. Just please do not pretend that you know anything about what someone else has experienced because you don't. Every nut case for the last 10,000 years has said the exact same thing, and stomped their impotent little feet, insisting their woo is real. Yawn. You may have convinced yourself this nonsense is true, but in saying you are "100 % convinced" you betray the state of your mind, and its illogical processes, and the nonsense you accept to prove something.
Every religion is true one way or another. It is true when understood metaphorically. But when it gets stuck in its own metaphors, interpreting them as facts, then you are in trouble. - Joseph Campbell
 Militant Atheist Commie Evolutionist  (November 12, 2018 at 6:38 pm)Astreja Wrote: (reads article quote)No one has up until now, and that is the whole reason they wrote the article, if you had taken the time to actually read it.... Quantum biology has only emerged over the past two decades and what the arrticle also said is that "it is a matter of when, not if" RE: DNA Proves Existence of a Designer
November 13, 2018 at 12:06 pm
(This post was last modified: November 13, 2018 at 12:13 pm by The Grand Nudger.)
No one has demonstrated any effect that supports any of your supernatural claims and you have failed to provide a single citation for those claims despite laundering more than a single link to that effect.
Stop. What you are attempting is so common that there's a name for it, the Gish Gallup. Quote:The Gish gallop is a technique used during debating that focuses on overwhelming an opponent with as many arguments as possible, without regard for accuracy or strength of the arguments. The term was coined by Eugenie C. Scott and named after the creationistDuane T. Gish, who used the technique frequently against proponents of evolution.[1][2]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gish_gallop Does this matter to you?
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
 RE: DNA Proves Existence of a Designer
November 13, 2018 at 12:14 pm
(This post was last modified: November 13, 2018 at 12:17 pm by Astreja.)
(November 13, 2018 at 12:02 pm)Everena Wrote: No one has up until now, and that is the whole reason they wrote the article, if you had taken the time to actually read it.... Quantum biology has only emerged over the past two decades and what the arrticle also said is that "it is a matter of when, not if" I disagree. Quantum physics simply does not work that way. Its effects are at small scales, and they don't even scale up in macroscopic physics. It's a sure sign that someone is engaging in magical thinking and sloppy pseudoscience when they attach the word 'quantum' to make some idiotic what-if-ism sound scientific and cutting-edge. As for your bare assertion that DNA could not have assembled itself, I disagree. Recently a simple biological mechanism was found for assembly of RNA (IIRC, magnesium was a key player in that particular biochemistry). DNA is next. I expect to see your hypothesis debunked in my own lifetime. |
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Users browsing this thread: 29 Guest(s)
