DNA Proves Existence of a Designer

[pocaracas]

That's the problem. YOU are convinced.
But you should be aware that the fact that you're convinced is not assurance that the world functions as you are convinced it does. As such, you should be humble (and, if I remember my Indiana jones, being humble is a big plus for your religion) and let there be some doubt in the way you present your point of view.

And nothing of what you've given us can provide such a certainty as the one you have concerning this DNA business. Sure, the DNA "machinery" is impressive. Sure it is complex. Sure it seems to encode the blueprints for a living organism. But, and this has been said a million times, that does not give you any assurance of how this "machinery" came into being.
Science postulates an approach based on evolving structures. There is also no 100% certainty, but the mechanism is plausible and relies only on chemistry. Chemistry which is known to work in particular ways... often complex.
The mechanism that you are certain of is... unknown?.. just that some super entity has to be responsible for it. "Has to be" because you can't imagine such complexity arising through natural means. But your lack of imagination need not correlate with reality.
So, some humility, CDF, please.

I humbly state the facts.  I stand firm on my beliefs though.

That is the opposite of what you should do!
I'm always appalled by the gall of believers which makes you guys certain of that in which you believe. Come on, the clue is in the title!
Belief, "an acceptance that something exists or is true, especially one without proof." https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/belief

This is where you should be humble and you fail utterly.
Not just you, but nearly every other believer in any religious entity. Can you explain to me where such lack of awareness of the nonexistence of support for the belief comes from?

You're doing what my kids do when faced with some phenomenon that they were not present to know how it happened: they make up an explanation that loosely fits and victoriously claim "I've got it, I know!".

[Abaddon_ire]

Are you now claiming that you god was wrong to endorse it?

No, it was His will.

That's worse. Now your claim is that not only is your god is immoral, but you are claiming that you have slavish subverted your own morality in favour of an imaginary immoral thug.

I will ask again, Is the following true or false...

There is no time. place or circumstance under which slavery is moral.

That is my position, it seems it is neither yours nor your gods position?

[Anomalocaris]

Here's a friendly monthly reminder...putting little shit trolls like CDF47 on ignore is good for your health.

My health is too robust to be affected in anyway by even the little shit troll’s non-existent god himself, much less by his nonexistent god’s 4th rate delusional would be minions such as this little shit trolls CDF47 himself.

So I pointing out to the troll of what substandard disgraceful quality control reject caliber of monkeyhood he really is, and amuse myself by guessing his indignant delusional denials.

[Pat Mustard]

Here's a friendly monthly reminder...putting little shit trolls like CDF47 on ignore is good for your health.

Ah now, give him his proper title. He's Mr Inquisition.

Superpower: Too dumb to walk and breathe at the same time.

[Anomalocaris]

Here's a friendly monthly reminder...putting little shit trolls like CDF47 on ignore is good for your health.

Ah now,  give him his proper title.  He's Mr Inquisition.

Superpower: Too dumb to walk and breathe at the same time.

Lack of oxygen to the monkey brain does explain it.

There you have it; Christianity - salvation through brain death.

[CDF47]

Ceedeez Why do you always bury your replies to me in walls of texts?  FSM weeps.  
RAmen.

Because I get on here about once or twice or more a day and respond to everyone at once.

---

This quote covers it I think.


“What gets us into trouble is not what we don't know. It's what we know for sure that just ain't so.”

― Mark Twain 

CDF "knows for certain" something which is not true.
He will say "na ha that's you that is" but he has been proven wrong on every page of this thread. Every page.

No, I haven't.

Yes you have.

No, really, I haven't.

[Nay_Sayer]

This was a scientific thread with religious implications.  Then I was asked religious questions which is understandable.

Ceedeez Why do you always bury your replies to me in walls of texts?  FSM weeps.  
RAmen.

Because I get on here about once or twice or more a day and respond to everyone at once.

---

No, really, I haven't.

nuh uh

[Bucky Ball]

Because I get on here about once or twice or more a day and respond to everyone at once.

The question is why do you do it.
You have no converts, and have not one person here you have convinced.
Why are you wasting your time here ?
You should be posting on woo sites and magic sites. Those people are ready to buy into this bs.

[downbeatplumb]

Ceedeez Why do you always bury your replies to me in walls of texts?  FSM weeps.  
RAmen.

Because I get on here about once or twice or more a day and respond to everyone at once.

---

No, really, I haven't.

Yes you have.

(I could keep this up all day)

[The Grand Nudger]

CDF strongly attaches his beheite beliefs with the christian god notion.  To accept that he's been taken for a ride by the id movement is tantamount to the destruction of the christian framework it exploits.  When a person tells him that the ID arguments he puts forward have been thoroughly and incontrovertibly discredited..he responds with something more akin to "no you haven't proven christer god wrong!".  

Hence the impasse.  Unwilling to countenance his own ignorance,  and incapable of accepting a god that made him from a monkey - he instead hopes to negotiate with reality itself.