Posts: 67453
Threads: 140
Joined: June 28, 2011
Reputation:
161
RE: Debunking Creationism #1 - How Human Evolution Works
May 11, 2022 at 9:32 am
(This post was last modified: May 11, 2022 at 9:37 am by The Grand Nudger.)
None of them, however, can reconcile evolution itself or the theory which explains it..with the story in magic book.
It's not an issue of the word "kind" - though we've gone down that road on these boards before and it's a shitshow even on it's own grounds. Animals do not, in fact, reproduce according to their own kinds, because kind is an unworkable category with respect to the reality of biological divergence. Use "kind" to refer to any factual biological category and it will take all of twenty seconds to find a living counter-factual. As a society, though, we're more than willing to negotiate the reality of this with the afflicted. All things being equal..and even between christians...we know that a person who goes out of their way, ties their scrotum into a knot, attempting to make fantasy accord with reality, is less likely to be a terrible nutter.
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
Posts: 4738
Threads: 7
Joined: October 17, 2013
Reputation:
15
RE: Debunking Creationism #1 - How Human Evolution Works
May 13, 2022 at 9:37 pm
(This post was last modified: May 13, 2022 at 9:53 pm by Huggy Bear.)
(May 11, 2022 at 9:32 am)The Grand Nudger Wrote: None of them, however, can reconcile evolution itself or the theory which explains it..with the story in magic book.
It's not an issue of the word "kind" - though we've gone down that road on these boards before and it's a shitshow even on it's own grounds. Animals do not, in fact, reproduce according to their own kinds, because kind is an unworkable category with respect to the reality of biological divergence. Use "kind" to refer to any factual biological category and it will take all of twenty seconds to find a living counter-factual. As a society, though, we're more than willing to negotiate the reality of this with the afflicted. All things being equal..and even between christians...we know that a person who goes out of their way, ties their scrotum into a knot, attempting to make fantasy accord with reality, is less likely to be a terrible nutter.
Kind means species, and animals do in fact reproduce according to their own species, the literal criteria of kind/species is being able to produce fertile offspring.
Posts: 4738
Threads: 7
Joined: October 17, 2013
Reputation:
15
RE: Debunking Creationism #1 - How Human Evolution Works
May 13, 2022 at 9:52 pm
(May 4, 2022 at 2:22 pm)QuackeryDetection Wrote: (May 4, 2022 at 7:50 am)Huggy Bear Wrote: False equivalence, Creationism and evolution aren't mutually exclusigve. You'd have to debunk creationism using abiogenesis.
Well creationists tend to not believe in evolution.
Not true, creationists don't believe humans evolved from some primordial soup.
Posts: 11512
Threads: 29
Joined: December 8, 2019
Reputation:
14
RE: Debunking Creationism #1 - How Human Evolution Works
May 13, 2022 at 9:52 pm
Quote:Kind means species, and animals do in fact reproduce according to their own species, the literal definition of kind/species is being able to produce fertile offspring.
Kind isn't a valid scientific term let alone meaning the same thing as species
"Change was inevitable"
Nemo sicut deus debet esse!
![[Image: Canada_Flag.jpg?v=1646203843]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=cdn.shopify.com%2Fs%2Ffiles%2F1%2F0630%2F5310%2F3332%2Fproducts%2FCanada_Flag.jpg%3Fv%3D1646203843)
“No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM
Posts: 11512
Threads: 29
Joined: December 8, 2019
Reputation:
14
RE: Debunking Creationism #1 - How Human Evolution Works
May 13, 2022 at 9:53 pm
(This post was last modified: May 13, 2022 at 9:55 pm by The Architect Of Fate.)
Quote:Not true, creationists don't believe humans evolved from some primordial soup.
1.No Creationists don't believe in evolution
2. No one says humans evoloved from primordial soup. Certainly not directly.
"Change was inevitable"
Nemo sicut deus debet esse!
“No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM
Posts: 4738
Threads: 7
Joined: October 17, 2013
Reputation:
15
RE: Debunking Creationism #1 - How Human Evolution Works
May 13, 2022 at 9:55 pm
(May 13, 2022 at 9:52 pm)Helios Wrote: Quote:Kind means species, and animals do in fact reproduce according to their own species, the literal definition of kind/species is being able to produce fertile offspring.
Kind isn't a valid scientific term let alone meaning the same thing as species
Do you know what synonymous means?
Posts: 11512
Threads: 29
Joined: December 8, 2019
Reputation:
14
RE: Debunking Creationism #1 - How Human Evolution Works
May 13, 2022 at 9:56 pm
Quote:Do you know what synonymous means?
Yes
"Change was inevitable"
Nemo sicut deus debet esse!
“No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM
Posts: 4738
Threads: 7
Joined: October 17, 2013
Reputation:
15
RE: Debunking Creationism #1 - How Human Evolution Works
May 13, 2022 at 10:01 pm
(May 13, 2022 at 9:56 pm)Helios Wrote: Quote:Do you know what synonymous means?
Yes
Then you should know that 'kind' and 'species' are synonymous and have the same definition.
Posts: 11512
Threads: 29
Joined: December 8, 2019
Reputation:
14
RE: Debunking Creationism #1 - How Human Evolution Works
May 13, 2022 at 10:04 pm
(This post was last modified: May 13, 2022 at 11:55 pm by The Architect Of Fate.)
In actual modern biology, they don't. "Kinds" are creationist make-believes and have zero credibility outside that unhinged pseudoscience. Life is not a collection of separate lifeforms in bubbles instead every lifeform is merely a modification of a previous lifeform and so on. Life is the accumulation of modifications etc. Creationist Taxonomy is nonsense.
18.23 really puts the nail in the coffin
"Change was inevitable"
Nemo sicut deus debet esse!
“No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM
Posts: 11512
Threads: 29
Joined: December 8, 2019
Reputation:
14
RE: Debunking Creationism #1 - How Human Evolution Works
May 14, 2022 at 12:07 am
(This post was last modified: May 14, 2022 at 12:07 am by The Architect Of Fate.)
Creationism is garbage 
"Change was inevitable"
Nemo sicut deus debet esse!
“No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM
|
