Posts: 3188
Threads: 8
Joined: December 9, 2011
Reputation:
31
RE: Same sex marriage
May 14, 2012 at 9:42 am
(May 14, 2012 at 9:19 am)StatCrux Wrote: No it wasn't! that definition was specifically about definitions of male and female! Anyone can read the text.
that definition came after this point, remember?
"right stay on this topic, no diversions. answer the question, what is the definition of male and female? If male and female exist (which you accepted) give your criteria for determining them. You have consistently failed to provide any definitions. "
If anyone can read the text, then why don't you? Zen has been consistently addressing only your position on same sex marriage, not male-female distinction. The statement I gave is applicable to both, marriage and male/female distinction. Since you have provided your incorrect criteria for only one of them, it is obvious which one was being referred to.
Posts: 5389
Threads: 52
Joined: January 3, 2010
Reputation:
48
RE: Same sex marriage
May 14, 2012 at 9:45 am
(This post was last modified: May 14, 2012 at 9:45 am by Zen Badger.)
Pffft, this one is incapable of rational debate.
P.s Stat, here is your religion in one pic.
Good night all.
![[Image: mybannerglitter06eee094.gif]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=i118.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fo112%2Fpussinboots_photos%2FBikes%2Fmybannerglitter06eee094.gif)
If you're not supposed to ride faster than your guardian angel can fly then mine had better get a bloody SR-71.
Posts: 3188
Threads: 8
Joined: December 9, 2011
Reputation:
31
RE: Same sex marriage
May 14, 2012 at 9:46 am
(May 14, 2012 at 9:31 am)StatCrux Wrote: I do eject that rule, that has never been my position. I say marriage is defined in part not only as a union open to to procreation of offspring in principal. Any union not open to procreation in principal is therefore not a marriage. Infertile couples (male/female) are still in principal procreative even if not in actuality.
Remember this statement?
Rule: Same sex relationships are not procreative in principal (Ie without recourse to artificial intervention)
As indicated here, by "in principle", you mean without recourse to artificial intervention. Ergo, according to you, infertile couples are not procreative in principle and therefore their union is not a marriage.
Posts: 12512
Threads: 202
Joined: January 3, 2010
Reputation:
107
RE: Same sex marriage
May 14, 2012 at 9:46 am
Oh... ![Blush Blush](https://atheistforums.org/images/smilies/blush.gif) I'm sorry, I was not aware that ONLY MALES were to discuss on this thread...night everyone!
"The Universe is run by the complex interweaving of three elements: energy, matter, and enlightened self-interest." G'Kar-B5
Posts: 13051
Threads: 66
Joined: February 7, 2011
Reputation:
92
RE: Same sex marriage
May 14, 2012 at 9:46 am
StatCrux Wrote:Same sex unions are not procreative in principal.
StaCrux Wrote:...keep the male-female unions are procreative in principal despite the fact that exceptions exist
Haven't figured out the difference between principle and principal, have you?
Even if the open windows of science at first make us shiver after the cozy indoor warmth of traditional humanizing myths, in the end the fresh air brings vigor, and the great spaces have a splendor of their own - Bertrand Russell
Posts: 3188
Threads: 8
Joined: December 9, 2011
Reputation:
31
RE: Same sex marriage
May 14, 2012 at 9:52 am
(May 14, 2012 at 9:40 am)StatCrux Wrote: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hGOXJI-fZmQ
So now that you have shown where you get your stupid views from, are you giving up on justifying them?
Posts: 390
Threads: 8
Joined: September 9, 2011
Reputation:
2
RE: Same sex marriage
May 14, 2012 at 9:59 am
(May 14, 2012 at 9:52 am)genkaus Wrote: (May 14, 2012 at 9:40 am)StatCrux Wrote: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hGOXJI-fZmQ
So now that you have shown where you get your stupid views from, are you giving up on justifying them?
Not at all, and it seems that the UK government has conceded that most people are in agreement.
Posts: 3188
Threads: 8
Joined: December 9, 2011
Reputation:
31
RE: Same sex marriage
May 14, 2012 at 10:31 am
(May 14, 2012 at 9:59 am)StatCrux Wrote: Not at all, and it seems that the UK government has conceded that most people are in agreement.
If only reality could be determined by simple agreement.
Posts: 390
Threads: 8
Joined: September 9, 2011
Reputation:
2
RE: Same sex marriage
May 14, 2012 at 10:45 am
(May 14, 2012 at 10:31 am)genkaus Wrote: (May 14, 2012 at 9:59 am)StatCrux Wrote: Not at all, and it seems that the UK government has conceded that most people are in agreement.
If only reality could be determined by simple agreement.
Gay couples already have equal rights in law regarding same sex relationships in the UK, why do they feel the need for it to be called marriage? This isn't about equality it's about redefining the current definition of marriage.
Posts: 1066
Threads: 248
Joined: February 6, 2012
Reputation:
7
RE: Same sex marriage
May 14, 2012 at 11:03 am
(May 14, 2012 at 10:45 am)StatCrux Wrote: (May 14, 2012 at 10:31 am)genkaus Wrote: If only reality could be determined by simple agreement.
Gay couples already have equal rights in law regarding same sex relationships in the UK, why do they feel the need for it to be called marriage? This isn't about equality it's about redefining the current definition of marriage.
and it is not the first time is has happened.Tthe whole redefining marriage thing.
"Religion is regarded by the common people as true, by the wise as false, and by the rulers as useful" - Edward Gibbon (Offen misattributed to Lucius Annaeus Seneca or Seneca the Younger) (Thanks to apophenia for the correction)
'I am driven by two main philosophies:
Know more about the world than I knew yesterday and lessen the suffering of others. You'd be surprised how far that gets you' - Neil deGrasse Tyson
"Sometimes I wonder whether the world is being run by smart people who are putting us on or by imbeciles who really mean it." - Mark Twain
|