Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 11, 2024, 11:59 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Should there be Atheist groups?
#21
RE: Should there be Atheist groups?
(August 28, 2008 at 3:45 am)KRW1612 Wrote: When white man arrived in Australia 230 years ago they had never heard of the Christian god or Jesus Christ or Allah or Mohammed. Why? because they had never been taught about these entities. Entities that have been man made by other peoples.
While that statement is true, it does not infer the following:
(August 28, 2008 at 3:45 am)KRW1612 Wrote: Therefore we are all born non-believers until such time as some of us are indoctrinated by the teachers of religion, whether they be familly, school teachers, clergy, etc.
Because the aboriginals had, and still have their own religion.
But you rescued yourself with:
(August 28, 2008 at 3:45 am)KRW1612 Wrote: If you started a community on a remote island without any knowledge of the current crop of gods and religions, and they had no contact with the rest of the world for 6 generations they would never know the Christian god, or any of the others. However they may have created their own by then, or remained without any.

I'm sure however, that societies will naturally rend towards the development of a religion and a priest caste until better understanding of the nature of the world makes that no longer necessary.

Individual atheists and philosphers may crop up ahead of their time but the move towards secular societies requires a security and level of science education.

I can provide no data for this assertion.
'How can you say, "We are wise, for we have the law of the LORD," when actually the lying pen of the scribes has handled it falsely? Jer 8:8
A child of five would understand this. Send someone to fetch a child of five. Groucho Marx
Reply
#22
RE: Should there be Atheist groups?
(August 27, 2008 at 7:33 am)Tiberius Wrote: If religion didn't exist I am sure some people would still believe in gods. If there were no atheists then yes there would be only theists. Whether they would still refer to themselves by that name might be a more worthy topic.

I've always thought it strange to give someone a particular name because they don't believe in something.
[Image: cinjin_banner_border.jpg]
Reply
#23
RE: Should there be Atheist groups?
(August 28, 2008 at 4:53 am)Darwinian Wrote: I've always thought it strange to give someone a particular name because they don't believe in something.

I'm sure we can find other examples if we think long enough. It's not the same thing but we have the word "bald" to describe people with no hair . . .

We call people who don't believe in lots of stuff "skeptics" Smile

A conservative doesn't believe in change.

OK I'm reaching here, but there has GOT to be another example of a word in English that describes a disbelief in something.
'How can you say, "We are wise, for we have the law of the LORD," when actually the lying pen of the scribes has handled it falsely? Jer 8:8
A child of five would understand this. Send someone to fetch a child of five. Groucho Marx
Reply
#24
RE: Should there be Atheist groups?
But with baldness their really is such a thing as hair.

If you can come up with 10 words to describe someone who doesn't believe something you win a prize..

I'll start you off.

1) Atheist
[Image: cinjin_banner_border.jpg]
Reply
#25
RE: Should there be Atheist groups?
bloody hell, I'm just looking for a second one - 10!
2) Unbeliever - (includes non-believer and disbeliever)
3) skeptic
4) Heathen
5) Heretic
6) iconoclast
7) Dissenter
8) Doubter
9) Cynic
10) Empiricist

These are all arguable and should perhaps be in the symantics thread!

Thesarus often gave "agnostic" as synonymous with "atheist" but I didn't buy it.
'How can you say, "We are wise, for we have the law of the LORD," when actually the lying pen of the scribes has handled it falsely? Jer 8:8
A child of five would understand this. Send someone to fetch a child of five. Groucho Marx
Reply
#26
RE: Should there be Atheist groups?
Again the whole concept of disbelief comes into play. Any disbelief is a belief in its own right. Evolutionists disbelieve Creationism because they believe Evolution. It is a very rationalized belief of course, but still a belief.

Creationists disbelieve in the Big Bang as well.

There are an infinite of ways you can address the subject of disbelief.
Reply
#27
RE: Should there be Atheist groups?
(August 28, 2008 at 6:27 am)Tiberius Wrote: Again the whole concept of disbelief comes into play. Any disbelief is a belief in its own right. Evolutionists disbelieve Creationism because they believe Evolution. It is a very rationalized belief of course, but still a belief.

Creationists disbelieve in the Big Bang as well.

There are an infinite of ways you can address the subject of disbelief.

But what if those things didn't exist would there still be definitions and labels for them?

Also, saying evolutionist? Tisk tisk tisk bad Adrian!
Reply
#28
RE: Should there be Atheist groups?
(August 28, 2008 at 6:12 am)StewartP Wrote: bloody hell, I'm just looking for a second one - 10!
2) Unbeliever - (includes non-believer and disbeliever)
3) skeptic
4) Heathen
5) Heretic
6) iconoclast
7) Dissenter
8) Doubter
9) Cynic
10) Empiricist

These are all arguable and should perhaps be in the symantics thread!

Thesarus often gave "agnostic" as synonymous with "atheist" but I didn't buy it.

Very good, but I really meant 10 words to describe a disbelief in something specific in the same way that atheist describes a disbelief in a god or gods.

For example, is there a word for the disbelief in ghosts, or aliens or salmons orbiting Jupiter etc?

But as you've put in so much work I think you deserve a little prize Tongue
[Image: cinjin_banner_border.jpg]
Reply
#29
RE: Should there be Atheist groups?
Well any political opinion I suppose can count such as a Communist perhaps?
Reply
#30
RE: Should there be Atheist groups?
(August 28, 2008 at 9:05 am)Darwinian Wrote: For example, is there a word for the disbelief in ghosts, or aliens or salmons orbiting Jupiter etc?
If there were a word specific to such a believer I suppose there would be a word for someone who disbelieves it. In each case though, you only have the "belief" of such things. So if you called someone who believed in salmons orbiting Jupiter a "Salmonite" then you would have the people who call themselves the opposite (whatever it may be).
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Is there a kink to have sex with certain atheist tribes? Woah0 5 947 September 11, 2022 at 3:28 pm
Last Post: onlinebiker
  Maybe there's something like a god out there. Ryantology 38 3987 June 5, 2020 at 8:42 am
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  How should an atheist react to discrimination? Der/die AtheistIn 21 3334 March 26, 2019 at 9:14 pm
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  Should I tell my girlfriend that I'm an atheist? erealmz 45 10563 November 19, 2017 at 9:07 am
Last Post: downbeatplumb
  Atheists, tell me, a Roman Catholic: why should I become an atheist? Balaco 596 113516 June 14, 2017 at 3:26 am
Last Post: Omnisofos
  Is There an Atheist Groups Powerful Enough to Counter Fox and Protect Gay Rights Rhondazvous 6 2006 September 14, 2015 at 3:03 am
Last Post: Thumpalumpacus
  How should I go about telling my parents that I'm atheist Ghost2282 12 3590 February 15, 2015 at 11:25 pm
Last Post: Pyrrho
  Why Should Someone Be an Atheist? savedwheat 364 69305 January 8, 2014 at 8:44 am
Last Post: Belac Enrobso
  Maybe People Should Not Look Up To YouTube Atheist Bipolar Bob 200 64524 January 6, 2014 at 12:14 am
Last Post: EgoRaptor
  How Should We React When a ‘Militant Atheist’ Beats Up a Pastor? Gooders1002 40 14329 November 5, 2013 at 2:08 pm
Last Post: Doubting Thomas



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)