Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 25, 2024, 6:50 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
at what point did inorganic matter become organic life forms and what caused it?
#41
RE: at what point did inorganic matter become organic life forms and what caused it?
(July 19, 2013 at 9:52 pm)christcahinkilla Wrote: i am trying to help people that are trapped in dogmatic beliefs and ideologies that are unproven.

FSM Grin

What a kind person you are.
Reply
#42
RE: at what point did inorganic matter become organic life forms and what caused it?
a real person?
Reply
#43
RE: at what point did inorganic matter become organic life forms and what caused it?
At what point did you become real?
"The Universe is run by the complex interweaving of three elements: energy, matter, and enlightened self-interest." G'Kar-B5
Reply
#44
RE: at what point did inorganic matter become organic life forms and what caused it?
kind - the german word being = freundlich

nice can also be used instead of kind.

meant here by me in my previous post in a sarcastic way.

[Image: 39876808.jpg]
Reply
#45
RE: at what point did inorganic matter become organic life forms and what caused it?
(July 19, 2013 at 7:29 pm)christcahinkilla Wrote: exactly so it's safe to say that humanity doesn't have that answer yet?

atheism = dogmatic = religion = hypocrisy, can we all just get along now and take off all of our clothes?

I don't know when or how life on earth began, but there are some good hypotheses and there is evidential support for them. We're working on it.

I don't know whether or not any gods exist, but there is no evidence for any of them and mountains of evidence against most of them.

Those are the common opinions of many scientific people and many atheists.
Skepticism is not a position; it is an approach to claims.
Science is not a subject, but a method.
Reply
#46
RE: at what point did inorganic matter become organic life forms and what caused it?
What's the point of this thread? To tell me that I can't know whether a god exists or not?

Well, thank you so fucking much. Next you'll be telling me that water is wet
Even if the open windows of science at first make us shiver after the cozy indoor warmth of traditional humanizing myths, in the end the fresh air brings vigor, and the great spaces have a splendor of their own - Bertrand Russell
Reply
#47
RE: at what point did inorganic matter become organic life forms and what caused it?
(July 19, 2013 at 10:12 pm)KichigaiNeko Wrote: At what point did you become real?

that's funny i would ask an evolutionist the same question

my answer is i dont know. you?

(July 19, 2013 at 10:21 pm)Chas Wrote:
(July 19, 2013 at 7:29 pm)christcahinkilla Wrote: exactly so it's safe to say that humanity doesn't have that answer yet?

atheism = dogmatic = religion = hypocrisy, can we all just get along now and take off all of our clothes?

I don't know when or how life on earth began, but there are some good hypotheses and there is evidential support for them. We're working on it.

I don't know whether or not any gods exist, but there is no evidence for any of them and mountains of evidence against most of them.

Those are the common opinions of many scientific people and many atheists.

thank you so much for your civility.

and i think that most atheists and scientific people are nice decent reasonable people. I also think that many religious people are nice decent reasonable people. but the underlying ideologies of a group are not always out in the open and my argument is that atheism is no different than christianity in that respect. people should be careful of what name they associate with any group that has a common belief of something unknown.

and in general, athiesm holds that "we do not believe in a god or gods" and ill repeat it, that is not the same as saying "I don't have any belief in the subject of whether or not a god or gods exist."
Reply
#48
RE: at what point did inorganic matter become organic life forms and what caused it?
(July 19, 2013 at 10:44 pm)christcahinkilla Wrote:
(July 19, 2013 at 10:12 pm)KichigaiNeko Wrote: At what point did you become real?

that's funny i would ask an evolutionist the same question

my answer is i dont know. you?

(July 19, 2013 at 10:21 pm)Chas Wrote: I don't know when or how life on earth began, but there are some good hypotheses and there is evidential support for them. We're working on it.

I don't know whether or not any gods exist, but there is no evidence for any of them and mountains of evidence against most of them.

Those are the common opinions of many scientific people and many atheists.

thank you so much for your civility.

and i think that most atheists and scientific people are nice decent reasonable people. I also think that many religious people are nice decent reasonable people. but the underlying ideologies of a group are not always out in the open and my argument is that atheism is no different than christianity in that respect. people should be careful of what name they associate with any group that has a common belief of something unknown.

and in general, athiesm holds that "we do not believe in a god or gods" and ill repeat it, that is not the same as saying "I don't have any belief in the subject of whether or not a god or gods exist."

I do not believe that any gods exist because there is no evidence of any.

I don't know that no gods exist, but I lack any belief in them.

That's not the same as your statement. You have stated agnosticism.
Skepticism is not a position; it is an approach to claims.
Science is not a subject, but a method.
Reply
#49
RE: at what point did inorganic matter become organic life forms and what caused it?
fair enough.

I have to admit Im wrong when Im wrong.

so the term agnostic atheist is somewhat oxymoronic?
Reply
#50
RE: at what point did inorganic matter become organic life forms and what caused it?
(July 19, 2013 at 11:11 pm)christcahinkilla Wrote: fair enough.

I have to admit Im wrong when Im wrong.

so the term agnostic atheist is somewhat oxymoronic?

No, it's clarifying even if a bit awkwardly stated.
Skepticism is not a position; it is an approach to claims.
Science is not a subject, but a method.
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Transitional Forms/Fossils QuackeryDetection 15 2470 November 12, 2022 at 1:05 pm
Last Post: Anomalocaris
  Life eating other life. Brian37 42 3833 May 14, 2021 at 4:44 am
Last Post: BrianSoddingBoru4
  quality of life or life for life's sake tackattack 37 3484 November 24, 2018 at 9:29 am
Last Post: Little lunch
  The return of the the complex organic molecules! ScienceAf 0 559 September 15, 2016 at 7:24 pm
Last Post: ScienceAf
  GMO vs Organic scoobysnack 66 11069 March 23, 2016 at 7:43 am
Last Post: Alex K
  And no, Creatards..."Adam and Eve" Did Not Ride Them! Minimalist 30 5189 May 12, 2015 at 12:27 am
Last Post: Regina
  Flying in the face of the organic debate Justtristo 1 1642 April 24, 2013 at 9:03 pm
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
Information Brain tumor caused pedophilia Simon Moon 5 3268 January 10, 2013 at 11:17 am
Last Post: Minimalist
  How did the chemicals for life come together??.. dave4shmups 44 12195 December 6, 2010 at 1:01 pm
Last Post: Minimalist
  Did humans and dinosaurs ever coexist? theophilus 40 29057 September 1, 2010 at 11:43 am
Last Post: Minimalist



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)