The Bible Takes It Up The Ass, Again!

[Godscreated]

Same old childish junk and after you use it you expect us to take you seriously.

The man who believes in a 6,000 year old earth wants to sit in judgment over others about credibility.

I've never said the earth 6000 years old and actually stated it's older, get your facts straight before posting please.

GC

[Bad Wolf]

So how much older? 10,000?

[truthBtold]

So how much older? 10,000?

10,001... da!!!

[Godscreated]

Same old childish junk and after you use it you expect us to take you seriously.

GC

How cute, that you thought anybody took you seriously to begin with!

Why that's just about as precious as a dog chasing a parked car...

Cartoons, reverting to a child I see and as for taking me serious some here do. I do not care whether you do or not, you live low on my list to actually care about your opinion.

GC

---

G-C, you need to get your head out of your ass...and your fucking bible...and learn that camels were introduced to Egypt by the Persians. Oddly, the evidence suggests that those same Persians introduced monotheism to a bunch of ignorant inhabitant of a burned out city in Judah in the 6th century as well. But I figure that will make your fucking head explode.

No one is saying there were no camels. What they are saying is that they were domesticated for the Arabian trade. It was the riches of the Arabian trade which led the Assyrians to expand southward and dominate those routes.

I really don't give a flying fuck what your silly-assed bible says. It's a pile of shit. This is about archaeology and you are as ignorant on the subject as Drippy. For your information...not that I think you will listen to anything that doesn't start with "In The Beginning" because you are a hopeless case... the domestication (not taming!) of Asian elephants goes back to 6,000 BC.... which oddly is before a first class schmuck like you thinks the world even existed.

Ummmm yes the babble takes it up the arse AGAIN!

Full article

Shit it is even reported by Faux news!

Archaeologists say they've pinpointed the domestication of camels in the Middle East -- and the science directly contradicts dates in the Bible. (FOXNEWS.COM / JEREMY A. KAPLAN)
Archaeologists from Israel’s top university have used radiocarbon dating to pinpoint the arrival of domestic camels in the Middle East -- and they say the science directly contradicts the Bible’s version of events.

Camels are mentioned as pack animals in the biblical stories of Abraham, Joseph and Jacob, Old Testament stories that historians peg to between 2000 and 1500 BC. But Erez Ben-Yosef and Lidar Sapir-Hen of Tel Aviv University's Department of Archaeology and Near Eastern Cultures say camels weren’t domesticated in Israel until centuries later, more like 900 BC.

Oh dear.

Kich, there are a number of articles that show camels were in Canaan long before the Israelites took the land, yet they have called them wild camels without any explanation, I'm just wondering why. How could it be possible they could know the difference since both are of the same structure, I mean really how could they know the camels were not domesticated and even if they were not what would make them believe the camels were not tamed to do the work man desired. Taming of wild animals is one of the first steps in domestication.

GC

[Minimalist]

http://www.thejc.com/news/world-news/115...-narrative

He did not think that challenging details of the biblical narrative had any impact on faith. “I don’t think that religious faith has anything to do with facts on the ground,” he said.

Dr. Ben-Yosef understands you bible-thumping shits better than you understand yourselves!

[Justtristo]

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/201...131518.htm

Camels are mentioned as pack animals in the biblical stories of Abraham, Joseph, and Jacob. But archaeologists have shown that camels were not domesticated in the Land of Israel until centuries after the Age of the Patriarchs (2000-1500 BCE). In addition to challenging the Bible's historicity, this anachronism is direct proof that the text was compiled well after the events it describes.

o determine exactly when domesticated camels appeared in the southern Levant, Dr. Sapir-Hen and Dr. Ben-Yosef used radiocarbon dating and other techniques to analyze the findings of these digs as well as several others done in the valley. In all the digs, they found that camel bones were unearthed almost exclusively in archaeological layers dating from the last third of the 10th century BCE or later -- centuries after the patriarchs lived and decades after the Kingdom of David, according to the Bible.

Put another way...the bible ain't worth camel shit.

I have read a bit about these archaeological discoveries and they confirm a rather late date for the domestication of the Dromedary Camel, which now is roughly dated to around 1000 BCE.

[Bad Wolf]

Come on GC tell us! How old do you believe the earth is?

[EvolutionKills]

How cute, that you thought anybody took you seriously to begin with!

Why that's just about as precious as a dog chasing a parked car...

Cartoons, reverting to a child I see and as for taking me serious some here do. I do not care whether you do or not, you live low on my list to actually care about your opinion.

GC

Yeah, it's a shame that an 80's extended toy commercial (Transformers) still managed to tell a better, more coherent, and ultimately more plausible story than your Bible.

[Minimalist]

Another scholar to pound sand up G-C's tight little asshole!

http://www.npr.org/2014/02/14/276782474/...-of-camels

MONTAGNE: So from what you've said, it sounds like it's really good evidence for something that could be considered controversial, which is good evidence for the fact that the texts were written - or at least updated - long after the events they're describing happened.

MEYERS: You nailed it, yeah, absolutely. It's another piece of a very large set of data that leads us to understand that the kind of literature we have in the Bible is not history in the way that we think of the term history today.




MONTAGNE: Carol Meyers is a professor of religious studies at Duke University. Thank you for joining us.

Pay particular attention to that last line G-C. She is and you aren't.

You're just as asshole.

[xpastor]

Kich, there are a number of articles that show camels were in Canaan long before the Israelites took the land, yet they have called them wild camels without any explanation, I'm just wondering why. How could it be possible they could know the difference since both are of the same structure, I mean really how could they know the camels were not domesticated and even if they were not what would make them believe the camels were not tamed to do the work man desired. Taming of wild animals is one of the first steps in domestication.

GC

Whenever an animal is domesticated, humans change the way it lives and also start to select for the characteristics they desire, and these factors result in subtle differences in the structure. Archaeologists are quite confident they can detect the difference between domesticated and wild animals of several kinds—pig, cow, chicken, horse, dog, etc.—and can even tell how far along the road to domestication a particular example has come.

I'm not an archaeologist or a biologist, so the only example which I can give you offhand is that a dog's teeth differ somewhat from a wolf's because the dog has more vegetable matter in its diet.