Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 17, 2024, 6:10 am
Thread Rating:
|
Next They'll Be Wanting to Burn Them
|
 (April 28, 2014 at 7:23 pm)Cato Wrote:(April 28, 2014 at 7:15 pm)Lek Wrote: Do you want the public schools to have the students read books with sexually charged material? I know how sexually charged tenth graders are. That's even more good reason not to give them sexually charged literature.  (April 28, 2014 at 7:31 pm)Lek Wrote:Why? Is there something wrong with sex?(April 28, 2014 at 7:23 pm)Cato Wrote: This is the problem with Christian notions of proper sex. Which do you think is more sexually charged; the tenth grader or the literature?  (April 28, 2014 at 7:31 pm)Lek Wrote: I know how sexually charged tenth graders are. That's even more good reason not to give them sexually charged literature. Is that seriously the extent of your argument? "They like it, therefore we should keep it from them?" It's hilarious: do you actually live in a world where every kid in school isn't connected to the internet through at least one device that is perpetually with them?
"YOU take the hard look in the mirror. You are everything that is wrong with this world. The only thing important to you, is you." - ronedee
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects! 
I'm not sure what people think censoring content will do. Teenagers don't have sex because they read something in a book or saw something on TV. They have sex because their bodies have reached the developmental stage where they can start procreating. They may not really be fit to do it, but leaving them ignorant of it all doesn't help.
Poe's Law: "Without a winking smiley or other blatant display of humor, it is impossible to create a parody of Fundamentalism that SOMEONE won't mistake for the real thing."
10 Christ-like figures that predate Jesus. Link shortened to Chris ate Jesus for some reason... http://listverse.com/2009/04/13/10-chris...ate-jesus/ Good video to watch, if you want to know how common the Jesus story really is. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=88GTUXvp-50 A list of biblical contradictions from the infallible word of Yahweh. http://infidels.org/library/modern/jim_m...tions.html  (April 28, 2014 at 7:31 pm)Lek Wrote:(April 28, 2014 at 7:23 pm)Cato Wrote: This is the problem with Christian notions of proper sex. Which do you think is more sexually charged; the tenth grader or the literature? Once again, this then requires the bible to be banned in schools Playing Cluedo with my mum while I was at Uni: "You did WHAT? With WHO? WHERE???" 
Let's not forget that the "sexually-charged" accusation wasn't the only objection that "some parents" made. They also stapled "mocked the Christian religion" to it.
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist. This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair. Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second. That means there's a situation vacant.'
(April 28, 2014 at 9:23 pm)Stimbo Wrote: Let's not forget that the "sexually-charged" accusation wasn't the only objection that "some parents" made. They also stapled "mocked the Christian religion" to it. WHat's wrong with that? I mock Christianity every bloody day. 
Playing Cluedo with my mum while I was at Uni: "You did WHAT? With WHO? WHERE???" RE: Next They'll Be Wanting to Burn Them
April 28, 2014 at 9:31 pm
(This post was last modified: April 28, 2014 at 9:33 pm by Lek.)
(April 28, 2014 at 9:01 pm)NoraBrimstone Wrote:(April 28, 2014 at 7:31 pm)Lek Wrote: I know how sexually charged tenth graders are. That's even more good reason not to give them sexually charged literature.Why? Is there something wrong with sex? No. Not under the proper circumstances. (April 28, 2014 at 9:05 pm)Esquilax Wrote:(April 28, 2014 at 7:31 pm)Lek Wrote: I know how sexually charged tenth graders are. That's even more good reason not to give them sexually charged literature. Would you want the school to give them porn to read since they're going to read it anyway? (April 28, 2014 at 9:09 pm)Chad32 Wrote: I'm not sure what people think censoring content will do. Teenagers don't have sex because they read something in a book or saw something on TV. They have sex because their bodies have reached the developmental stage where they can start procreating. They may not really be fit to do it, but leaving them ignorant of it all doesn't help. We don't have to leave them ignorant. |
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)
