Quote:And I'd venture to say that in many Middle Eastern countries, rising up, or even speaking out, would be a death sentence, since the extremist sect is actually the government.lol no its not that bad there is just few countries like that and thanks god am not living in one of them
Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 26, 2024, 11:30 pm
Thread Rating:
Refuting misconceptions:2-jihad not terrorism
|
Here's an interesting report on the question of terrorism among muslims in 2009.
Egypt: 8% approval of attacks on civilians in US (and 2% with mixed feelings) Indonesia: 5% (8%) Pakistan: 9% (15%) Morrocco: 7% (8%) Palestinian territories: 24% (15%) Jordan: 11% (12%) Turkey: 8% (10%) Azerbaidjan: 4% (10%) (95% confidence intervals of +/- 3 percentage points ) Quote:Quote:at least speak out against them so you don't feel the need to clear your holy book's name to a bunch of internet atheists. This really amazes me: Those terrorists are trashing Islam on an international level and still no campaign on national levels is made. This show that the rejection of terrorism is not clear, as the statistics above show. My explanation: moderate muslims have a hard time rejecting their extremist fellow brothers, because they are still their brothers, in the same way we are much slower to condemn a friend or family for a bad action than to condemn a stranger for the same action. There is a human double standard: US marines killing muslim civilians in Irak outrages the muslim community, but when some muslim extremists do the same thing on non-muslim civilians the Ummah has mixed feelings about its condemnation. Quote:This really amazes me: Those terrorists are trashing Islam on an international level and still no campaign on national levels is made. This show that the rejection of terrorism is not clear, as the statistics above show. My explanationthats because they are not unified and most of the rulers dont give a shit to what is happening wether in islamic or non islamic countries except if there is something will affect their place as president or the ruler Quote:moderate muslims have a hard time rejecting their extremist fellow brothers, because they are still their brothers, in the same way we are much slower to condemn a friend or family for a bad action than to condemn a stranger for the same action.we are not that racist man lol these terrorists are killing muslims as much as they are killing non muslims even in 9/11 a lot of muslims died Quote: There is a human double standard: US marines killing muslim civilians in Irak outrages the muslim community, but when some muslim extremists do the same thing on non-muslim civilians the Ummah has mixed feelings about its condemnation.what is happening in iraq and in palestine is much more than 9/11 and the outrages you are talking about has nothing to do with religion in egypt there is a lot of people who defend iraq and palestine are non muslims. about the mixed feeling some people have it because the hate towards some countries also not to other religions when i was young i used to hate americans because they are killing palestinians but when i grew up i start understanding that the americans have nothing to do with that its the government but i really never met anyone who agree for any of the terrorist acts wether in muslim or non muslim country (June 5, 2010 at 3:37 pm)mo3taz3nbar Wrote:Quote:moderate muslims have a hard time rejecting their extremist fellow brothers, because they are still their brothers, in the same way we are much slower to condemn a friend or family for a bad action than to condemn a stranger for the same action. I'm not talking about race, but about people one considers close to oneself. The togetherness in Islam highlighted by the Ummah is such that there are feelings which refrain you from condemning thoroughly other muslims for bad actions for which you would immediately condemn the perpetrator if he were a non-muslim. This is my explanation for the absence of real condemnation on an national level of terrorism. You don't want to judge quickly other muslims, even though they are clearly misguided. That's why there is also no condemnation for the "cultural" (as you said) laws in certain muslim countries which disrespect the Qur'an's teachings. If I understood you, only the shahada is needed to be a muslim and join the "family" of the Ummah. It means that unislamic actions can be made by large numbers of muslims without being easily condemnable by the righteous muslims because it goes down to understanding the clear and right interpretations (if they ever exist...) of the Qur'an which are not easy to understand sometimes. And moreover the feelings of togetherness refrain the righteous muslims from condemning those muslims, because the Ummah must look united at all cost ! That's why your "real" Islam is extremely hard to enforce in all muslim countries. (June 5, 2010 at 3:37 pm)mo3taz3nbar Wrote:I know, I was just giving you an example, regardless of the context, where muslims denounce some strangers' action and don't denounce the same actions made by muslimsQuote: There is a human double standard: US marines killing muslim civilians in Irak outrages the muslim community, but when some muslim extremists do the same thing on non-muslim civilians the Ummah has mixed feelings about its condemnation.what is happening in iraq and in palestine is much more than 9/11 and the outrages you are talking about has nothing to do with religion in egypt there is a lot of people who defend iraq and palestine are non muslims. about the mixed feeling some people have it because the hate towards some countries also not to other religions when i was young i used to hate americans because they are killing palestinians but when i grew up i start understanding that the americans have nothing to do with that its the government but i really never met anyone who agree for any of the terrorist acts wether in muslim or non muslim country RE: Refuting misconceptions:2-jihad not terrorism
June 5, 2010 at 6:18 pm
(This post was last modified: June 5, 2010 at 6:22 pm by mo3taz3nbar.)
Quote:I'm not talking about race, but about people one considers close to oneself. The togetherness in Islam highlighted by the Ummah is such that there are feelings which refrain you from condemning thoroughly other muslims for bad actions for which you would immediately condemn the perpetrator if he were a non-muslim.i never thought about that but you are right.maybe the reason is that if anyone condemned the acts of binladen he will have serious trouble(maybe i really dont know the reason for that)but you know we dont have someone to talk in the name of the muslims its always different countries and political issues i think if there was a powerful rightous muslim president maybe it would be different Quote:This is my explanation for the absence of real condemnation on an national level of terrorism. You don't want to judge quickly other muslims, even though they are clearly misguided. That's why there is also no condemnation for the "cultural" (as you said) laws in certain muslim countries which disrespect the Qur'an's teachings.when someone doesnt ask for his rights you will never ask for them as when there is a culture issues disrespecting Quran teaching in a muslim country like opressing women they dont even talk and most of them are used to that and its something really bad i hope i can do something about it Quote:[quote]If I understood you, only the shahada is needed to be a muslim and join the "family" of the Ummah. It means that unislamic actions can be made by large numbers of muslims without being easily condemnable by the righteous muslims because it goes down to understanding the clear and right interpretations (if they ever exist...) of the Qur'an which are not easy to understand sometimes.the Quran is really not that hard to interpret if i have an arabic dictionary and understanding of in what situation this verses was revealed anyone can interpret it the important thing is to read the context Quote:And moreover the feelings of togetherness refrain the righteous muslims from condemning those muslims, because the Ummah must look united at all cost !i feel so happy when you use the word ummah.but thats not the case they forgot about Islam and they are different now and not united because of political issues plz guys am preparing for my next thread and i hope to know what you want to know about Islam and also to tell me about some good books regarding atheism to read (June 5, 2010 at 6:18 pm)mo3taz3nbar Wrote: i think if there was a powerful rightous muslim president maybe it would be differentA president concerns themselves with politics and running a country. This has nothing to do with religion. What would be good would be an accepted representative body of Islam declaring immorality wrong. But like I said above, Islam promotes immorality as you outlined in this thread. Another weakness is like with the Catholic church, Muslims consider themselves such by birth as much as anything else. It makes for a more inclusive membership, with accompanying mass; but also a membership ignorant of the actual meaning of the religion. Hence in reality the struggle of people seeking justice leading to terrorism latching onto an easy cause which buys you political power - Islam.
Dear mo3tanz3nbar:
I despise everything your religion claims to stand for. More so than I could ever despise Christianity or any other religion, as at least one of those is founded on grace, whereas your religion is founded upon oppression and fear. Hell, your religion means "submission" - submission to Allah, Muhammad and whatever Imam's cock you suck. There are no misconceptions about Islam here - except for the few deluded members who actually think there may be a way to civilize that savage religion. Of course, had Christianity not had the reformation, we might have something similar with honor killings, beating women, throwing acid, going nuts over a little piece of paper, etc,. Fuck Islam. Fuck it's oppressiveness and fuck it's apologists. You guys deserve to live in the 15th century with those attitudes. I'd be happy to leave y'all be, but you people have a habit of trying to drag the rest of us into your anachronistic death cult. Quote:I'd be happy to leave y'all be, but you people have a habit of trying to drag the rest of us into your anachronistic death cult. And once in you can never leave, on pain of DEATH. MWAHAHA. You can fix ignorance, you can't fix stupid. Tinkety Tonk and down with the Nazis. RE: Refuting misconceptions:2-jihad not terrorism
June 8, 2010 at 5:13 am
(This post was last modified: June 8, 2010 at 5:17 am by mo3taz3nbar.)
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/10262402.stm
99% in turkey are muslims they prisoned about 14 person as they suspect them to belong to al qaeda (June 5, 2010 at 7:21 pm)Synackaon Wrote: Dear mo3tanz3nbar: I find myself in agreement with Pat Condell and you, Syn. http://youtube.com/watch?v=vjS0Novt3X4 |
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)