Abortion not allowed

[fr0d0]

Why can't people see past their bias? It's religiosity at its worst, practiced by atheists here.

[Fidel_Castronaut]

I trust the Bible which says no human should take away a life from someone else.

Bracketing out the definition of person, the bible also has a myriad of examples where God actively condones the taking away of people's lives.

But it's only not a contradiction to what you posted If you redefine the word contradiction.

[fr0d0]

And contradictions are only contradictions because we say they are.

[Fidel_Castronaut]

And contradictions are only contradictions because we say they are.

Nah, they're contradictions because they contradict other things said in the same piece of text. There's no other way of looking at them, unless you don't look at them.

[Tonus]

With Christianity you have a choice.

Then why did you give an example that implies otherwise?

[Esquilax]

lol esq please put your handbag away. You were trying to be condescending. Admit it. It's plain for everyone to see.

"It's just obvious!" is not a compelling argument. I've already explained my position, by what possible means could you have more information on my life by which to gainsay it?

PS "I certainly don't have to apologise for the percieved wrongdoing of an imperious liar" lol Are you saying that you don't have to apologise for something I've done!?! Haha Mate, I think you should seriously reconsider your career choices. But only if accuracy helps in your style of writing

Subject attribution is a weakness of mine. I never claimed to be a perfect writer, nor would I ever. Happily, I have an editor to help with that, and my reviews so far don't indicate any particular problems with the final product.

[C4RM5]

With Christianity you have a choice.

Then why did you give an example that implies otherwise?

What example.

---

I am not in a position to question God.

So you admit that the bible doesn't say that people shouldn't take life away from other people?

No i don't admit that.

---

I'll help you out esq. You were being condescending. Using an insulting name to assert your self imposed superiority.

Like I said, I call my fiancee that too. I called my friends that, before it took on that significance. It's a subversion of gender roles thing: my male friends were kitten or love, my female friends were champ or slugger. It's just me being silly.

But again, thank you for taking charge of what I think for me. Obviously I can't be trusted with my own positions, since I keep thinking they're something else!

I am just joking when I say your slaging me honestly it is fine with it.

[Bad Wolf]

So you admit that the bible doesn't say that people shouldn't take life away from other people?

No i don't admit that.

Well, you said that the bible doesn't say to kill other people, at which point I said that it does, giving several clear examples. Then you said you don't question gods word which wasn't really an answer. How do you reconsile this without admitting your original statment was wrong?

Do you want me to quote the bible verses?

[Tonus]

Then why did you give an example that implies otherwise?

What example.

This one:

I think being able to trust in something is a positive quality. For instance say for some reason you hanging of the edge of a large drop and someone is ready to pull you back up, do you let them pull you up and have faith or do you ask for factual evidence to prove that they can pull you up?

[C4RM5]

No i don't admit that.

Well, you said that the bible doesn't say to kill other people, at which point I said that it does, giving several clear examples. Then you said you don't question gods word which wasn't really an answer. How do you reconsile this without admitting your original statment was wrong?

Do you want me to quote the bible verses?

If you want I can't stop it.