I don't recall ever seeing evidence that circumcision has any appreciable health benefits.
In every country and every age, the priest had been hostile to Liberty.
- Thomas Jefferson
- Thomas Jefferson
Indoctrinating Children in Religion
|
I don't recall ever seeing evidence that circumcision has any appreciable health benefits.
In every country and every age, the priest had been hostile to Liberty.
- Thomas Jefferson RE: Indoctrinating Children in Religion
March 10, 2015 at 3:12 pm
(This post was last modified: March 10, 2015 at 3:12 pm by robvalue.)
Nor me. I'll have to check that out.
Thanks Sion Feel free to send me a private message.
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists. Index of useful threads and discussions Index of my best videos Quickstart guide to the forum RE: Indoctrinating Children in Religion
March 10, 2015 at 3:14 pm
(This post was last modified: March 10, 2015 at 3:14 pm by Silver.)
(March 10, 2015 at 3:10 pm)FatAndFaithless Wrote: I don't recall ever seeing evidence that circumcision has any appreciable health benefits. The benefit I see most often cited is the cleanliness angle. Young boys are the most prone to getting infections due to not being circumcised because it is not within their nature to properly clean themselves. As a result, the infections require a circumcision. How many times were you informed to clean behind your ears and you never did? It is the same concept. Therefore, it is better to circumcise so that the boys who already do not properly clean themselves do not have to worry about getting infected.
"Never trust a fox. Looks like a dog, behaves like a cat."
~ Erin Hunter RE: Indoctrinating Children in Religion
March 10, 2015 at 3:16 pm
(This post was last modified: March 10, 2015 at 3:16 pm by GrandizerII.)
(March 10, 2015 at 11:55 am)Sionnach Wrote: There is nothing wrong with the parent deciding for the child what is best for him or her. Maybe you don't think it's wrong, but many do. And it's a matter of respecting the right of the person to choose for themselves. How would you feel if earlobes were cut off as a child because that's what your parents wanted?
Circumcision exists unfortunately in Judaism and Islam. Yet, they both insist that the body should be left untouched as the body is perfect. This is a bit silly considering circumcision is "cutting into the flesh."
(March 10, 2015 at 3:16 pm)Irrational Wrote: And it's a matter of respecting the right of the person to choose for themselves. The parent can decide whether or not to have the child circumcised. I am not infringing upon that. However, likening circumcision to cutting off of earlobes is ridiculous and illogical. The analogy does not work.
"Never trust a fox. Looks like a dog, behaves like a cat."
~ Erin Hunter (March 10, 2015 at 3:14 pm)Sionnach Wrote:Oh I'm familiar with the claims, but as far as I can recall any study I've seen just demonstrates no benefit, or a benefit rate that is roughly equal to the rate of a botched procedure (i.e. very, very tiny).(March 10, 2015 at 3:10 pm)FatAndFaithless Wrote: I don't recall ever seeing evidence that circumcision has any appreciable health benefits.
In every country and every age, the priest had been hostile to Liberty.
- Thomas Jefferson
There is also the aesthetic angle for me, personally. As a gay man, I will not have sexual relations with an uncircumcised man because the appearance of the penis in that state is an absolute turn off. In fact, studies show that the majority of women also prefer the circumcised penis.
"Never trust a fox. Looks like a dog, behaves like a cat."
~ Erin Hunter RE: Indoctrinating Children in Religion
March 10, 2015 at 3:27 pm
(This post was last modified: March 10, 2015 at 3:29 pm by GrandizerII.)
(March 10, 2015 at 3:22 pm)Sionnach Wrote:(March 10, 2015 at 3:16 pm)Irrational Wrote: And it's a matter of respecting the right of the person to choose for themselves. Just because they can legally doesn't make it absolutely ok. It's not illegal to verbally abuse your child, but that doesn't make it right. Quote:However, likening circumcision to cutting off of earlobes is ridiculous and illogical. The analogy does not work. Then explain why it doesn't work. Just saying it doesn't work doesn't explain anything. (March 10, 2015 at 3:26 pm)Sionnach Wrote: There is also the aesthetic angle for me, personally. As a gay man, I will not have sexual relations with an uncircumcised man because the appearance of the penis in that state is an absolute turn off. In fact, studies show that the majority of women also prefer the circumcised penis. Still doesn't justify removing a valuable body part as a child. I'm sure you'd look good without earlobes as well, but it's still not ok to have them cut off without your consent. (March 10, 2015 at 3:27 pm)Irrational Wrote: Then explain why it doesn't work. Just saying it doesn't work doesn't explain anything. Circumcision has its benefits, backed by the medical community, whether you want to accept it or not. If you cannot look past the oh, they're just hurting and marring poor infants mentality, then that is your personal problem. There are no benefits of cutting off an infants earlobes, unless you want to provide those benefits as the medical community has them listed?
"Never trust a fox. Looks like a dog, behaves like a cat."
~ Erin Hunter |
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|