|
Hello, Anyone interested in a debate?
|
 RE: Hello, Anyone interested in a debate?
May 21, 2015 at 5:05 pm
(This post was last modified: May 21, 2015 at 5:05 pm by Crossless2.0.)
As I said, this is not a debate location on this site. You should start a thread in a more appropriate place.
Good god you're either bring willfully dishonest or you're more dense than a diamond up Superman's ass.
In every country and every age, the priest had been hostile to Liberty.
- Thomas Jefferson  (May 21, 2015 at 5:05 pm)Crossless1 Wrote: As I said, this is not a debate location on this site. You should start a thread in a more appropriate place. Agreed. Which is why the thread was an introduction and an inquisition if anyone would like to debate. To which it was stated that more needed to be said about myself and about what I wish to debate. Request was made, and response was given. Naturally I would prefer to debate according to the debate rules rather than weather the numerous ad hominem attacks (which the debate rules prohibit.)
Oh lawdy please.
In every country and every age, the priest had been hostile to Liberty.
- Thomas Jefferson  (May 21, 2015 at 4:59 pm)Anima Wrote:(May 21, 2015 at 4:54 pm)Iroscato Wrote: Simple question - what stops YOU from doing immoral things? You so crazy man. ![[Image: rySLj1k.png]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=i.imgur.com%2FrySLj1k.png) If you have any serious concerns, are being harassed, or just need someone to talk to, feel free to contact me via PM 
Well? Anyone still want to debate?
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist. This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair. Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second. That means there's a situation vacant.'
 
Lemonvariable72
Copenhagen School  Religious Views: Its all bullshit to keep you handing money to the usher. (May 21, 2015 at 4:56 pm)Crossless1 Wrote:Okay first off. What about having an imaginary friend prevents moral utilitarianism? Also your example is wrong, under moral utilitarianism that is wrong because of the effect the society as a whole, the greatest number of people, as you would have to allow so that many can be skinned including people that enjoy it, so therefore since no one wants to be skinned it creates misery.(May 21, 2015 at 4:50 pm)Anima Wrote: You would be correct sir. I did not state I had a degree in philosophy.
To-morrow, and to-morrow, and to-morrow,
Creeps in this petty pace from day to day, To the last syllable of recorded time; And all our yesterdays have lighted fools The way to dusty death. Out, out, brief candle! Life's but a walking shadow, a poor player, That struts and frets his hour upon the stage, And then is heard no more. It is a tale Told by an idiot, full of sound and fury, Signifying nothing. (May 21, 2015 at 5:05 pm)FatAndFaithless Wrote: Good god you're either bring willfully dishonest or you're more dense than a diamond up Superman's ass. Ha ha. Clearly you recognize the humor in the use of good god. So...Why don't you believe in God? We hope for a better answer than because. (yes I lay a trap for you. Please proceed governor.) |
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
