(June 13, 2015 at 4:33 am)Neimenovic Wrote:Can you demonstrate that being black isn't?(June 13, 2015 at 4:13 am)Chuck Wrote: Is there a reason to say Bruce/carlin Jenner is a stegosaur if he/she/it feels with every fiber of his/her/its being that he/she/it is a roof lizard?
No, that would make her delusional, but this is an actual, described, diagnosable condition that has nothing to do with whims and everything to do with brain structure and chemistry
Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: January 31, 2025, 4:42 am
Thread Rating:
The right to mis-define oneself
|
RE: The right to mis-define oneself
June 13, 2015 at 5:27 am
(This post was last modified: June 13, 2015 at 5:40 am by robvalue.)
What I've learnt recently is that someone's brain mapping can indeed be "set up" for a female body, even when they are otherwise born male, and vice versa.
I don't particularly care what people refer to themselves as. If they want me to call them something, then I'll call them that, within reason. The problem comes when you have to assess the legal aspects. You certainly don't automatically become something you're not just because you say it. I think in the above example at least, there is a strong case for legally being a different gender. (I'm aware the law already exists, I'm supporting it!) Feel free to send me a private message.
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists. Index of useful threads and discussions Index of my best videos Quickstart guide to the forum RE: The right to mis-define oneself
June 13, 2015 at 5:34 am
(This post was last modified: June 13, 2015 at 6:05 am by Longhorn.)
(June 13, 2015 at 5:21 am)bennyboy Wrote: What does that even mean? What makes a person's psychology "female?" Can I claim that I have "black" psychology, and make everyone call me Mr. T? It means what it says: her brain is female, her personality is female, her identity is female If you don't see the difference between something as fundamentally a part of one's identity as gender and something as arbitrary as 'race', I'm afraid I can't help you Quote:Caitlyn/Bruce identifies as female, but I think this is a kind of sexism: it means he associates aspects of his own psychology with qualities that are considered female. This is stereotyping, and in my opinion, it's anti-feminist. A female isn't less of a woman if she's hairy, or strong, or has a heavy jaw. She's not less of a woman if she likes Monster Trucks, or watches Japanese squirrel-in-a-wood-chipper porn. Bring transgender has nothing to do with gender roles or traits traditionally associated with the given gender, it's all about brain structure and chemistry Quote:There IS no such thing as a female psychology, unless you are willing to stereotype. One's gender identity has nothing to do with stereotypes, one's interests or clothing style, it's entirely independent of that Why do you think there are no transwomen who aren't traditionally feminine? Quote:I'm really starting to get irate about this issue, because everyone said that transgender, etc. WASN'T a slippery slope. Now we can see that every fucking person can decide how they want people to treat them. Okay, from now on, nobody else gets to address me without calling me Sir Donkey Dick the Magic Space Monkey. How dare anyone question my donkey dick magic space monkey-ness? I have no idea what you're rambling on about. What does 'now' mean in this context? Who was saying it wasn't a slippery slope? What changed? people can decide how they want others to treat them?! OH THE HUMANITY Seriously, though, you are misunderstanding and misrepresenting what being transgender means. It's not mis-defining oneself, but exactly the opposite and is a bad example for this discussion. Equating gender dysphoria with wanting to have darker skin or believing you are a reptile is ridiculous, dishonest and makes you sound like an ignorant asshole. Please stop and do a little reading on the subject https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transgender (June 13, 2015 at 5:24 am)bennyboy Wrote:(June 13, 2015 at 4:33 am)Neimenovic Wrote: No, that would make her delusional, but this is an actual, described, diagnosable condition that has nothing to do with whims and everything to do with brain structure and chemistryCan you demonstrate that being black isn't? Define black. What is black? How black is black enough for you? Can you demonstrate it's anything more than skin tone? How much melanin does one need to have to be black? (June 13, 2015 at 5:36 am)Neimenovic Wrote:(June 13, 2015 at 5:24 am)bennyboy Wrote: Can you demonstrate that being black isn't? Feel free to send me a private message.
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists. Index of useful threads and discussions Index of my best videos Quickstart guide to the forum (June 12, 2015 at 11:16 pm)bennyboy Wrote: http://edition.cnn.com/2015/06/12/opinio...index.html "balance" is key here. This is one of those topics that is just not, as I say, "stupid simple". Yes, we can join "clubs" and fit in most times. But there are other times that no matter what we do we just won't "fit in". And sometimes that's ok. For example, I can act intelligent, speak nice, and talk about control and some would call me an Oreo.
anti-logical Fallacies of Ambiguity
Many trans women proudly label themselves TRANSwomen and not just "women". Identifying as a woman doesn't necessarily mean identifying with stereotypes. It just means she wants to be a woman.
Whoever fights monsters should see to it that in the process he does not become a monster. And if you gaze long enough into an abyss, the abyss will gaze back into you
RE: The right to mis-define oneself
June 13, 2015 at 8:57 am
(This post was last modified: June 13, 2015 at 9:01 am by bennyboy.)
(June 13, 2015 at 7:36 am)Dystopia Wrote: Many trans women proudly label themselves TRANSwomen and not just "women". Identifying as a woman doesn't necessarily mean identifying with stereotypes. It just means she wants to be a woman. And I want to be a pro basketball player. I feel I'm the next Michael Jordan, but I'm trapped in a slow, clumsy white boy's body. Maybe I should sue the NBA for not recruiting me. RE: The right to mis-define oneself
June 13, 2015 at 8:59 am
(This post was last modified: June 13, 2015 at 9:00 am by bennyboy.)
(June 13, 2015 at 5:36 am)Neimenovic Wrote: Define black. What is black? How black is black enough for you? Can you demonstrate it's anything more than skin tone?Well, when we say "black," we mean someone who has at least some African DNA, i.e. the African DNA of a few hundred years ago, not some residual DNA from a few hundred thousand. So I'd say to be "black," you need a non-zero amount of that DNA. Getting your hair crimped and applying a tanning agent is not sufficient. |
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Possibly Related Threads... | |||||
Thread | Author | Replies | Views | Last Post | |
To explain why we can define God to affirm his existence! | Mystic | 119 | 15592 |
March 24, 2017 at 11:27 am Last Post: Edwardo Piet |
|
Shouldn't the right to die be a human right? | ErGingerbreadMandude | 174 | 24895 |
February 4, 2017 at 7:52 pm Last Post: vorlon13 |
|
Why can't we be allowed to define atheism | Lemonvariable72 | 12 | 2370 |
November 30, 2013 at 10:18 am Last Post: Minimalist |
Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)