10 Questions Biblical Literalists Cannot Honestly Answer

[snowtracks]

http://www.atheistrepublic.com/blog/casp...tly-answer

---

1. You really can't really make a argument against it the bible says rape is cool. I mean hey those people over there kill the men the boys take the women for yourselves. 
And let's not forgot lot he offered up his daughters for one hell of a orgy and they got wrecked literally. 

2. No.. Fuck no... Hell no.. absolutely not

3. That's like eating a moldy piece of  fruit it's still bad eating around the good part's doesn't make it better. 

4. There was no great flood the god damn story is a rip off of another rip off which is yet another rip off of some other religion. noahs ark is bullshit the end 
many other religions has a flood story it doesn't make it true. 

5. Man or humans didn't exist around the same time as dinosaurs also the Flintstones was a great cartoon still it but it doesn't make it historically accurate at all. Though our early ancestors did exist around the time of dinosaurs because hey evolution. Were not special and sure as hell not created in someones image were the product of millions of years of evolutionary change. Also were star stuff if you want to feel special because yeah that's a thing. 

---

6. god lied to adam and eve.

---

ending out deceiving spirits. 2 Chronicles 18:21-22 Ezekiel 14:9 and people say satan is bad... they need to read the bible god lied a lot in the book.
at least satan was honest and caring at least. 

7. the bible has no evidence because the bible like most religions is just a mechanism to control people.  look how fucking rich the vatican is they pray upon people in the third world protect child molesters and spread a religion that is not even true and people love them. why else would rich people love religion they don't fucking believe it that is there shield from people who hate them. Like the republicans they claim to be christian and push a christian agenda but why because it keeps people in line while they fuck them over. Because were a "christian" nation when were fucking not. sorry for the rant but Physical evidence destroys religion dead.

8. there better be fucking top quality proof for me or anyone to believe. 

9. there is no proof of any man made gods existing. people only believe a good to exist because  they are  brainwashed into believing one does. once we get over this mentality that a god or god(s) exist we can move forward. otherwise religion and god(s) have done nothing more than to harm us as a species now in the modern age. hopefully in the future we can see that religion no longer in it's current state exists. if we ever advance that far and not be nearly extinct as a species. 

10. hell is not canon to the bible it was added because people seen how bullshit christianity is. it was only added after the fact that people during that time were like... hey you know that hel place you believe in and this guy goes yeah thats were the dead go to move on because paganism. and the early christians were like well..hel...is a place were bad people go. And this is why christianity to this day exists is because of a lie in the bible. 



the christian bible 0 out 10 would never read again.

---

Appears you believe the conversation took place or maybe you just got up on the wrong side-of-the bed.

[Godscreated]

 I answered the ones you posted earlier. You did not ask me a question you made a statement about another paying for your sins, and ask what I thought about the verses pertaining to Christ's part in the act of mercy. I hate that my sin was responsible for what He went through, I'm glad He did accomplish what he set out to do through His love for mankind, an unconditional love. If He had not my destination would certainly be different than what it is.

There we go.  See, I hate that a god would make such an immoral thing the succes or failure condition for a soul.  He could have made it anything he wanted..being god, one presumes.  It could have even been doing good things..you know, being a good person.  But I'm digressing into insanity again, I suppose.

No, He couldn't have done anything different, if He could have don't you think He would have spared Jesus the horrors He had to endure, I know he would have. You seem to live on the edge of insanity. It's the way that the creator pays for and corrects what the created did. You yourself have said many times that God should fix this messed up world, He did and you have yet to realize it.

Now you going to answer my question or keep playing games?

GC

Now, what did you want examples of again? 

Do you know what omnipresence is, as pertaining to God?

GC

[Astonished]

There we go.  See, I hate that a god would make such an immoral thing the succes or failure condition for a soul.  He could have made it anything he wanted..being god, one presumes.  It could have even been doing good things..you know, being a good person.  But I'm digressing into insanity again, I suppose.

No, He couldn't have done anything different, if He could have don't you think He would have spared Jesus the horrors He had to endure, I know he would have. You seem to live on the edge of insanity. It's the way that the creator pays for and corrects what the created did. You yourself have said many times that God should fix this messed up world, He did and you have yet to realize it.

Now you going to answer my question or keep playing games?

GC

Now, what did you want examples of again? 

Do you know what omnipresence is, as pertaining to God?

GC

Are you fucking shitting me? The creator builds into the creation an imperfection, intentionally, that the creator finds distasteful, and yet assumes none of the fucking blame for that and places it squarely on the helpless creation that cannot possibly, by design, rid itself of that imperfection? The god who is so childish, so miniscule, as to be unable to own up to that, or at least not completely shift the blame elsewhere and just say, 'You know what, it's cool. I understand.' You are literally describing a god who is intentionally trying to be a complete piece of shit.

[John V]

countered by all the ones where he does

No, you haven't supplied any in which he explicitly says that. You've inferred it indirectly. When we don't have a direct and explicit statement, then inference from the indirect is fine. But, in this case we do have the direct and explicit statement, so inference is not needed.

Can pointing out more bible contradictions really help your cause ?

You're not "pointing out" a contradiction, you're inventing one by making incorrect inferences.

[The Grand Nudger]

There we go.  See, I hate that a god would make such an immoral thing the succes or failure condition for a soul.  He could have made it anything he wanted..being god, one presumes.  It could have even been doing good things..you know, being a good person.  But I'm digressing into insanity again, I suppose.

No, He couldn't have done anything different, if He could have don't you think He would have spared Jesus the horrors He had to endure, I know he would have. You seem to live on the edge of insanity. It's the way that the creator pays for and corrects what the created did. You yourself have said many times that God should fix this messed up world, He did and you have yet to realize it.

Seems like an arbitrary limit to the ability and wisdom of god, in service of conveniently excusing base immorality.  In any case, if that's true, and almighty god, the lord of creation, couldn't just do what humans do routinely - and he couldn't find a way other than stringing some poor fucker up, I don't want anything to do with that or that god.  

It's useless, to me.  

Do you know what omnipresence is, as pertaining to God?

GC

Sure, a claimed attribute of a fictional entity.  One wonders whether you believe it anyway.  Is god omnipresent at the tip of the peen in every sexual assualt?  Riding in and out?  Victim screaming, perp grunting...god, silent?

Useless to me, obviously useless to the victim - handy for the perp.

[Godscreated]

No, He couldn't have done anything different, if He could have don't you think He would have spared Jesus the horrors He had to endure, I know he would have. You seem to live on the edge of insanity. It's the way that the creator pays for and corrects what the created did. You yourself have said many times that God should fix this messed up world, He did and you have yet to realize it.

Seems like an arbitrary limit to the ability and wisdom of god, in service of conveniently excusing base immorality.  In any case, if that's true, and almighty god, the lord of creation, couldn't just do what humans do routinely - and he couldn't find a way other than stringing some poor fucker up, I don't want anything to do with that or that god.  

It's useless, to me.  

There was no limit, God made the ultimate sacrifice because man has screwed everything up He went as far as was possible for us.   I know your feelings about Christianity, but a God who would sacrifice what He did should say something to you about how much He cares.

Do you know what omnipresence is, as pertaining to God?

GC

Sure, a claimed attribute of a fictional entity.  One wonders whether you believe it anyway.  Is god omnipresent at the tip of the peen in every sexual assualt?  Riding in and out?  Victim screaming, perp grunting...god, silent?

Useless to me, obviously useless to the victim - handy for the perp.

I didn't think you knew what it meant, your dodging the question because you don't want to be wrong about this. Well you are and we know it don't we. Try again this time say something reasonable instead of the same ol' trash atheist throw around, it's unbecoming of the intelligent.

GC[/quote]

[The Grand Nudger]

There was no limit, God made the ultimate sacrifice because man has screwed everything up He went as far as was possible for us.   I know your feelings about Christianity, but a God who would sacrifice what He did should say something to you about how much He cares.

Well, if there was no limit (amusing. since two posts ago you told me that god couldn;t have done anything different..your beliefs are strangely movable) god could have achieved this some other way..some way other than the abject depravity of a blood sacrifice carried out upon another.  What is he supposed to have sacrificed,  A few nights of his eternal weekend?  Talk about finding a way to make a shitty thing even shittier by handling it in a trivial way.  

Stalkers "care" too, caring counts for shit when the subject is vicarious redemption.  Didn't care enough to do it some other, limitless way, huh?  So I guess that's another brick in the wall of bones.  Not only does "god" decide for no specific limitations to do the unthinkable, in a trivial way..because of it he damns any person who will not accept the fruit from the poisoned tree - any person who cannot in good conscience and will not accept the death of another for his own misdeeds. What a spectacular failure.

Or maybe all of this shit is made up.  Gee........lemme think.  

Sure, a claimed attribute of a fictional entity.  One wonders whether you believe it anyway.  Is god omnipresent at the tip of the peen in every sexual assualt?  Riding in and out?  Victim screaming, perp grunting...god, silent?

Useless to me, obviously useless to the victim - handy for the perp.

I didn't think you knew what it meant, your dodging the question because you don't want to be wrong about this. Well you are and we know it don't we. Try again this time say something reasonable instead of the same ol' trash atheist throw around, it's unbecoming of the intelligent.

GC

So he's not there, on the tip of every assaulting peen..or?

[Astonished]

countered by all the ones where he does

No, you haven't supplied any in which he explicitly says that. You've inferred it indirectly. When we don't have a direct and explicit statement, then inference from the indirect is fine. But, in this case we do have the direct and explicit statement, so inference is not needed.

Can pointing out more bible contradictions really help your cause ?

You're not "pointing out" a contradiction, you're inventing one by making incorrect inferences.

You can interpret the damn thing any way you like, and that's the problem, you can't claim any fucking truth in it if you're just going to convince yourself it means what you want to mean when there's really no other way to go about it (the rational skeptic tends to look at it at face value since we understand there's no deeper wisdom behind any of it). That's not helpful to you or anyone. Also good luck finding a consensus even among BELIEVERS about what the fuck you're defending, because this alleged god is supposed not to be the author of confusion and, well, irony being what it is, ends up being the epitome of that. Further, why should I trust your interpretation? Why can't the god who dictated or inspired this tome speak for himself and defend himself or clarify himself? Seems an awfully lazy, careless or malignant character that would just let things sit as they are when they alone hold responsibility for whether this message reaches everyone and comes through with utter clarity and is beyond dispute factually.

[Inkfeather132]

There we go.  See, I hate that a god would make such an immoral thing the succes or failure condition for a soul.  He could have made it anything he wanted..being god, one presumes.  It could have even been doing good things..you know, being a good person.  But I'm digressing into insanity again, I suppose.

No, He couldn't have done anything different, if He could have don't you think He would have spared Jesus the horrors He had to endure, I know he would have. You seem to live on the edge of insanity. It's the way that the creator pays for and corrects what the created did. You yourself have said many times that God should fix this messed up world, He did and you have yet to realize it.

If God could not have done anything differently, then he is not omnipotent.

[Amarok]

The theist Credo: making up  stupid things that make no sense then applying it to other people to equate them to you

---

If a good  god existed he would never have needed to fix the world. Because it would have never been broken in the first place . And creating loop holes is not fixing the problem anymore then placing buckets under a leaky roof patches it.