Quote:Equivocation.
Question #3:
If it's a good thing FOR YOU to have moral choices, would you agree that requires not only that YOU have complete freedom but also the possibility of choosing either good or evil? In other words, wouldn’t our freedom be severely restricted if we could only choose good?
Your question is nonsense because "good" is not objective, assuming the noun form which you have proposed. But, I'll do my best to answer.
It is knowledge and special empathy combined that allow one to 'choose good'. Your question posits that good is objective. I wholly reject your ignorant presupposition regarding the philosophy of goodness.
Therefore... your question is not only fallacious to begin with, but malformed at best.
Try again, Randy.