If God changed his mind

[Kingpin]

No it does not make it an atheistic state.  Atheism is not a movement but a personal declaration of a lack of belief in God.  

However, it was certainly not Christian.  If you replace the word Christianity with the word Atheism in hitler's speeches, would you say it was an atheist state or movement?

Hitler was enthralled with creating the "superman" or "ubermensch".  There are some that argue that Nietzsche's philosophy spear-headed the Third Reich and other Fascist states as under Stalin and Mussolini and there is certainly reasonably evidence to assume such as there are direct reflections back to the writings and idea of Nietzsche from each regime.  Nietzsche popularized the term, "God is dead, we have killed him".  Read his parable called "The Mad Man".  Where men kill the idea of God and then assume the role of God themselves.

You can't just replace terms in the speech as hitler often talked about his personal faith in detail quite similarly to how some Republican Presidents have done. The Catholic church also openly supported Mussolini and the fascist movements as a whole. They also maintained an official doctrine of anti semtiism till 64.

Was Hitler a Christian? Emphatically not, if we consider Christianity in its traditional or orthodox form: Jesus as the son of God, dying for the redemption of the sins of all humankind. It is a nonsense to state that Hitler (or any of the Nazis) adhered to Christianity of this form.

The idea of universal salvation through Christ dying on the cross - the core concern of the recent celebration of Easter - was complete anathema to the Nazis, who adhered to salvation by race rather than grace. However, it is equally true that there were leading Nazis who adhered to a form of Christianity that had been "aryanised."

Overall, one could argue that all the leading Nazis measured religion by a series of racial hurdles, meaning that: Jesus could not be Jewish, he had to be Aryan; a heroic fighter, not a passive sacrifice; the Old Testament had to be rejected, and the New Testament purged.

Yes the Church "supported" the fascist movements as they were promised autonomy if they stayed away from political agendas (the Concordat between Hitler and the RCC), hardly "support", it was purely political and in now way an endorsement of the ideas proposed by either church or state.

---

He did not have to convince his followers with Christianity.  He created a propaganda machine and lead with an iron fist.  His first moves as chancellor were abolishing the Reich Presidency and having the army swear a personal oath of unconditional obedience to him as "the Fuhrer of the German Reich and People."  Restoration of order, rebuilding the economy, removal of the scourge of unemployment, demolition of the restrictions of the hated Versailles Treaty, and the establishment of national unity all had wide popular resonance, ranging far beyond die-hard Nazis, appealing in fact in different ways to practically every sector of society. Opinion surveys long after the end of the Second World War show that many people, even then, continued to associate these "achievements" positively with Hitler.

Um. You just said he used christianity to get what he wanted. Which is it?

Vic, what I mean is he did not use Christianity to convince people to follow him.  He used social agendas, abolishing the establishment to gain favor and then used the Church and pleading to the Christian nation (Germany was 95% Christian) as a political tactic to further his goals of creating the superior race.