RE: A few points of conflict with Jackie L's (Eilonnwy) article.
October 28, 2010 at 9:22 am
(This post was last modified: October 28, 2010 at 9:29 am by tavarish.)
(October 28, 2010 at 5:40 am)thesummerqueen Wrote:(October 28, 2010 at 1:24 am)tavarish Wrote: I'll just chime in with this quote I found hilarious:
http://community.livejournal.com/liberal...#t60741916
Quote:By that standard, I'd expect more so-called 'attractive' women to want to be feminist, if only to be able to hope that one day they won't be judged on such superficial grounds.
Just like the attractive girl that works next to me gets by every day on her feministic attitude rather than her D boobs and stupid giggle?
I have a few issues with the list you posted, but I can't deny I've known a woman here or there to embody one or many of those factors.
This is why 90% of my friends are guys.
I have a few issues with it as well, and it has just as many fallacious arguments and hasty generalizations, but I just wanted to illustrate that it's a two-way street. I'm not anti-woman in any way, I just found it kind of funny how true some of that can be.
(October 28, 2010 at 7:41 am)fr0d0 Wrote: Are you being unbiased and neutral now Tav? Looks like you're still attacking. I'm sure the females are trembling in awe. Good job
So let's get this straight. You go along with Eilonnwy's argument, when she posts a few of these stupid checklists made by people with an agenda, supporting them fully and blaming others for her problems. I post one in jest, say I don't necessarily agree with its premises, and I'm attacking and adversarial?
Eat a dick.
My blog: The Usual Rhetoric