RE: Saint Peter's Bones
September 16, 2015 at 6:53 pm
(This post was last modified: September 16, 2015 at 7:02 pm by Randy Carson.)
(September 16, 2015 at 2:55 pm)Jenny A Wrote:(September 16, 2015 at 2:25 pm)Randy Carson Wrote: How many books have you read about the Shroud, Jenny? Which titles?
Irrelevant. That head is not human. It is grossly not. I gave you a citation for it about three posts back in this thread. But frankly, that was just looking for confirmation of what my own eyes tell me and a ruler confirms.
Then you have discovered something that dozens, if not hundreds, of trained medical professionals have somehow missed in the course of their hands-on study of the shroud...
Quote:How is my measuring different than your laying down and trying to put the arms in the same position as the shroud?
RationalWiki - Head Too Large
The Shroud is rectangular, measuring some 4.4 by 1.1 meters. The cloth (specifically linen) is woven in a three-to-one herringbone twill composed of flax fibrils. It shows faint but distinctive sepia images of the front and back of a naked man with his hands folded across his groin. The body image is muscular and 1.70 to 1.88 meters, or about 5'7" to 6'2", tall, with wound points as though they could have been caused by the process of crucifixion, but there is no generally accepted theory to explain how the image was impressed onto the cloth. However, it is accepted that the image is not anatomically correct — the head is 5% too large for its body, the nose is disproportionate, and the arms are too long. Source.
Secular Web Kiosk - Head Too Small
That the shroud head is too small is visually obvious when it is compared to normally proportioned humans on the same scale. The dimensions of the small and narrow head of the shroud are about nine-tenths the male norm. This may not sound like much, but because of the square-cube law modest differences in dimensions result in big changes in volume, so the capacity of the cranium was at least 30 percent below expectations. Source.
Jenny, this is the kind of pseudo-science that people glom onto when they are desperate to prove a pre-determined outcome.
"This CAN'T be the Shroud of Jesus...let's figure out why."
If you want to make a compelling case, Jenny, read books by scientists who are either neutral or supporters of the Shroud's authenticity. Then prove them wrong.
Heck, you can start here tonight:
The Authentication of the Turin Shroud:
An Issue in Archaeological Epistemology
by William Meacham - Archaeologist
CURRENT ANTHROPOLOGY - Vol. 24 - N° 3 - (June 1983)
Published by the University of Chicago Press
Copyright 1983 by the Wenner-Gren Foundation for Anthropological Research
All Rights Reserved
Reprinted by Permission
https://www.shroud.com/meacham2.htm