(September 20, 2015 at 12:47 am)Psychonaut Wrote: Not at all, I would assume that the moral objectivist superiority starts when you think your opinion matters outside your own skull, IE: "out there".
People are different, and there are things currently beyond our understanding that influence what they do.
I'm not celebrating anyone's demise, I'm just saying that it's ridiculous that you and Iroscato think that Wyrd of Gawd is "morally wrong". Like some kind of absolute fact. If that's your opinion, fine, but I'd deem it wise to remember that when posting.
Telling people what they "ought" to do is just another way of telling people that you think your cultural/biologically contingent way of life is superior to their culturally/biologically contingent way of life. Simple.
I'm sorry, but where did either abaris or Iroscato tell people what to think or do, or state that their position is superior? Why is it ridiculous to make a moral judgement of someone's actions? I haven't read anything that would indicate they were voicing anything other than their opinion, and I'm not sure where you got that from.
