Chill out, douchebag.
We normally love engaging on all of the topics you cited.
We probably argue through one to two of them weekly, I'd say. Mainly, we're exhausted from doing it so much, and getting the same kind of dishonest replies from the people who come here with their "challenges".
Copypasta is not a citation relevant to the argument, it's making the entire argument in someone else's (plagiarized) words. It's also deeply disrespectful because you did it that way, spamming us, instead of posting a link to peruse at our leisure, or of summarizing it in your own words, so we'd know we were arguing with you and not a website.
The fact that you are already calling us "dishonest" (and worse) tells me the opinion you have of atheists. Try to imagine if I came onto a Catholic forum and talked to the Catholics like you're talking to us.
We normally love engaging on all of the topics you cited.
We probably argue through one to two of them weekly, I'd say. Mainly, we're exhausted from doing it so much, and getting the same kind of dishonest replies from the people who come here with their "challenges".
Copypasta is not a citation relevant to the argument, it's making the entire argument in someone else's (plagiarized) words. It's also deeply disrespectful because you did it that way, spamming us, instead of posting a link to peruse at our leisure, or of summarizing it in your own words, so we'd know we were arguing with you and not a website.
The fact that you are already calling us "dishonest" (and worse) tells me the opinion you have of atheists. Try to imagine if I came onto a Catholic forum and talked to the Catholics like you're talking to us.
A Christian told me: if you were saved you cant lose your salvation. you're sealed with the Holy Ghost
I replied: Can I refuse? Because I find the entire concept of vicarious blood sacrifice atonement to be morally abhorrent, the concept of holding flawed creatures permanently accountable for social misbehaviors and thought crimes to be morally abhorrent, and the concept of calling something "free" when it comes with the strings of subjugation and obedience perhaps the most morally abhorrent of all... and that's without even going into the history of justifying genocide, slavery, rape, misogyny, religious intolerance, and suppression of free speech which has been attributed by your own scriptures to your deity. I want a refund. I would burn happily rather than serve the monster you profess to love.
I replied: Can I refuse? Because I find the entire concept of vicarious blood sacrifice atonement to be morally abhorrent, the concept of holding flawed creatures permanently accountable for social misbehaviors and thought crimes to be morally abhorrent, and the concept of calling something "free" when it comes with the strings of subjugation and obedience perhaps the most morally abhorrent of all... and that's without even going into the history of justifying genocide, slavery, rape, misogyny, religious intolerance, and suppression of free speech which has been attributed by your own scriptures to your deity. I want a refund. I would burn happily rather than serve the monster you profess to love.
