(September 24, 2015 at 5:24 pm)Grehoman Ebenezer Wrote:(September 24, 2015 at 5:18 pm)Stimbo Wrote: You attribute a fair application of the Rules to dishonesty. Yet you were the one who came here with an "open challenge to anyone" as a way of using the forum as a pulpit from which to preach your magic book and regurgitate the contents of other websites. If your mythology is so important to you, I direct you to Romans 13:1-2 ...
In other words, you will submit to the Rules of the forum or else accept the consequences.
And this is exactly why I said you are being dishonest.
An exception to the 30/30 requirements is when external content is used within a discussion or with the intention of discussion. For example, a member who has not yet met the 30/30 requirements is allowed to post external content if they are using it as evidence in a discussion, or if it is relevant to the ongoing discussion.
- 30/30In addition to the advertising rule, new members must make 30 posts and be a member for 30 days before they are allowed to post external content, such as links, images, or videos. This is to ensure that advertising is not the sole purpose for the member joining the forums. Any posts where the sole intention is to link to external content may be removed by staff, and will not count towards the 30 posts requirement. Once the 30/30 requirements have been met, members are free to post external content, however the advertising rule will still apply. An exception to the 30/30 requirements is when external content is used within a discussion or with the intention of discussion. For example, a member who has not yet met the 30/30 requirements is allowed to post external content if they are using it as evidence in a discussion, or if it is relevant to the ongoing discussion.
You are clearly,being dishonest.I read these rules that's why I THOUGHT I could add the links and videos.
Mods-
Seriously, I read the 30/30 Exception the same way. So did CL when she first joined.
There appears to be a pattern and a problem with the way that exception is interpreted.
Just sayin'.
