RE: The Paradox of Power....
October 3, 2015 at 2:44 pm
(This post was last modified: October 3, 2015 at 2:47 pm by Edwardo Piet.)
There are no good theistic arguments though, they're all fallacious. I mean, William Lane Craig may be a good debater but only because he's a specious cunt. It's all fallacious bull.
Obviously Sam Harris thrases him when he totally ignores throughout the whole debate Sam Harris' point that there's both epistemological and ontological definitions of objective, and all William Lane bangs on about is the ontological definition, what a prick, side tracking with Red Herring's and Strawmen.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rq1QjXe3IYQ
And the Edited version minus the William Lane bullshit:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R8FRqMK8OOY
Obviously Sam Harris thrases him when he totally ignores throughout the whole debate Sam Harris' point that there's both epistemological and ontological definitions of objective, and all William Lane bangs on about is the ontological definition, what a prick, side tracking with Red Herring's and Strawmen.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rq1QjXe3IYQ
And the Edited version minus the William Lane bullshit:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R8FRqMK8OOY