(December 8, 2010 at 1:40 am)Moros Synackaon Wrote:(December 7, 2010 at 10:45 pm)lrh9 Wrote: I can with laws and with violence if necessary. One person, one vote. One person, one voice. As long as I'm alive and not imprisoned corporations will have no right to threaten or devalue a person's vote or voice with unlimited spending and firings. You can be a fascist, but you cannot shield yourself from the consequence of your oppression. Retaliation. If corporations aren't bought to heel their leaders and lap dogs will get a shotgun enema.
There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, and ammo.
(December 7, 2010 at 11:52 pm)Mishka Wrote: Tell us how that works out for once they lock you up with people that have different ideas about enemas. What you accuse corporarions of is what unions have been doing for decades. You just hate the playing field getting leveled out.
Unions developed as a reaction to industry exploitation. And yet you wish to "level" the playing field by giving corporations disproportionate power, instead of restraining in wayward unions.
What a fascist solution.
You can try to lock up others, but know that whenever a group of people holds disproportionate power over others, there will never be peace.
First, how do corporations hold disproportionate power? Hmmmm? Secondly, what you legal giants fail to realize is if you restrain what unions can say, that's prior restraint. Unconstitutional. What the Supreme Court said was that you cannot muzzle other groups as well. You don't get to pick and choose which interest group can say what about politics. The facist solution is the one you propose, restraining unions, wayward or not.