Here's why Creatards might be right

[Rhondazvous]

Science does not provide rules as to how the world should work.Science merely make observations of it and try to provide explanations for why it is the way it is.But how did it come be the way it is?Why does the water rise when we fill a bucket with water?Why doesn't it go down?Anyone that comes up with a scientific answer for why the water doesn't go down but up have not understood what or why science truly is.
Science is not the reason why the apple fell down.Science is not the reason why it hurts to have a cactus up your ass.
Science is the attempt at an explanation for why the apple fall down.Science is the attempt at an explanation for why it hurts to have a cactus up your ass.(Frankly I wouldn't need science to figure that out.)

Anyway,science is merely a tool that attempts to explain the already designed world.But how did the world come to be the way it is?Surely not by evolution.Isn't that stuff for the living things?Then from what The big bang? So basically there was nothingness and there was a big explosion and earth was created and people would move forward if they walked forward(I know it seems stupid but that's because it's how things have always been and it seems silly to question it.But have you ever wondered why you move forward when you walk forward?)and apples would fall down if they were thrown up.Kind of not very convincing tbh.I mean,why does water turn into ice when we cool it?The only explanation we have is a scientific explanation,not that it's a bad thing it's just that if water were to turn into chocolate(analogically) when we cooled it,then we'd figure out a scientific explanation for that too.So what the point?

If the world really was designed and implemented,we'd be explaining the implementation using science and the design would forever be a mystery.
I mean,nobody is really going to understand why a rock comes down when you throw it up - it just does.This hints for a pre-designed world.Thus my conclusion that creationists might be right.What do you think?

Disclaimer:

---

This is only an idea I got when I was taking a shit and I saw a bucket get filled by water.Don't need any flame wars.You can contribute if you have something to contribute or you can move on.
And no.I'm not revealing what I've been smoking.

---

Yes, but this is the kind of idea that creatards would take to heart, and despite your disclaimer, they will get stuck on the “fact” that a non-believer admitted to this. So let’s examine it.
Firstly, if every scientific discovery ever made was proven to be false, that would not prove the creation story. Help me out Pyrrho. I’m sure there’s a classic fallacy that describes saying that B must be true because A is false.

Secondly just because science can’t tell us why things are the way they are doesn’t prove the creation story. The creation story provides a nonsensical explanation. So in the absence of any explanation at all you would put a nonsensical one simply because you feel there’s got to be an explanation. Like nature you abhor a vacuum. But again, that proves nothing.

DISCLAIMER: When I say “you,” I don’t mean you, pool, but anyone who would take your idea as proof of creation.