(October 29, 2015 at 1:12 pm)jenny1972 Wrote: nobody can prove anything either way there is no proof that there is an intelligent design although there are indications that there could be . and there also is no proof in the unlikely possibility that everything that exists is just the result of random accidental perfect coordination between very different organisms that all live on the same earth . other than the big bang leftover noise that the scientist religious leaders have assumed must be from the big bang event.
I see. So you'd just like to paint science in the most ludicrous manner possible so that you can argue its answers are no better than those of religion. You are at least right that extremely ludicrous is the direction to go if you wish to argue for a false equivalency between the two. However, the more you say about science the more obvious it becomes you don't know what you're talking about. The 'left over noise' wasn't just attributed to the big bang arbitrarily. When science posits it as a theory it isn't elevating it to dogma the way religion would, it is merely stating that it is the best explanation presented so far .. the one that makes the best account of all the known data. The door is wide open to present a better theory. [Pro tip: this isn't an appropriate place to suggest creator genie.]
