RE: Here's why Creatards might be right
October 29, 2015 at 7:25 pm
(This post was last modified: October 29, 2015 at 7:26 pm by Simon Moon.)
(October 29, 2015 at 7:09 pm)jenny1972 Wrote:(October 29, 2015 at 5:40 pm)Esquilax Wrote: So basically you just want to halt your respect for science at some arbitrarily derived point in the past and ignore all future discoveries because there was a smart guy at that time that you think might give your ideas extra credibility.
You clearly don't give a shit about science, so you can drop all this "study of physics" stuff; what you care about is finding people who agree with you who seem smart. If you cared about science you'd be following the cutting edge of it, but you're content on just stopping wherever suits you best.
an intelligent creator gave us our intellect and science so why wouldnt i have respect for both science is great and makes the world a better place . humans have limited understanding if we didnt scientist would have all the mysteries figured out already wouldnt they ? im open to considering something you think is an unintelligent disorganized manifestation in existence .
Those are more unsupported assertions.
Please provide demonstrable evidence that any of them are likely true.
And no, "look at nature. I can't imagine how it could have happened via natural means, so it must have been a god" is not evidence.
You'd believe if you just opened your heart" is a terrible argument for religion. It's basically saying, "If you bias yourself enough, you can convince yourself that this is true." If religion were true, people wouldn't need faith to believe it -- it would be supported by good evidence.
