(October 29, 2015 at 10:58 pm)jenny1972 Wrote:(October 29, 2015 at 10:15 pm)Rhythm Wrote: No, you clearly don't believe in evolution or modern synth...you clearly don't know what either of them are. You think it's something that wizards have done to us, and the method by which magic was achieved..... Fact.
That is the conclusion of Modern Synth, not my opinion. That these things, x, y, and z..account for the observations. There is no line in the theory that states. "And also god, maybe". Modern Synth is science, intelligent design is not, they have nothing to do with each other. Fact.
They -don't- require intelligence. I keep telling you that this "out of nothing" bullshit has nothing to do with me..but you keep typing it, shitposter. -You- are arguing against evolution and Synth.... when you refer to what it explains, as though it were evidence of something else....shitposter....... Fact.
No one has to provide you with any proof against the unevidenced, or for some position that they do not hold. No one. You are, again, assuming wrong...about logic.
i agree completely noone has provided me any proof that intelligent design did not contribute to evolution , and since i also cannot provide proof of my opinion as i said from the beginning i couldnt i wonder why the debate has lasted this long since both have no evidence and only opinion i suppose we can both just repeat and repeat over and over again the reasons why we have our opinions but i dont know why we would do that
Please tell me that you are a bot. I don't want to believe anyone could be this dense.
Everyone here has explained the burden of proof to you. Everyone here has pointed out the most basic logical flaws you make over and over.
You'd believe if you just opened your heart" is a terrible argument for religion. It's basically saying, "If you bias yourself enough, you can convince yourself that this is true." If religion were true, people wouldn't need faith to believe it -- it would be supported by good evidence.
