Here's why Creatards might be right

[TheRocketSurgeon]

The main problem with the Big Bang theory as you've explained it is that the gigantic clump of hydrogen would have gone nuclear and formed a star.  Remember, the largest stars we know about are UY Canis Majoris and UY Scuti.
http://www.planetsforkids.org/news/what-...-universe/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UY_Scuti

It's estimated that UY Canis Majoris would fill the orbit of Jupiter and that UY Scuti  might fill the orbit of Saturn.  So we know that hydrogen balls can grow to those sizes but it's an entirely different thing to think that a hydrogen ball could ever grow large enough to make the entire universe.  

A much better theory is that quantum foam creates particles that eventually morph into hydrogen atoms that clump together into giant balls that eventually go nuclear and form stars.  Eventually planets are created and the planetary processes also create elements and, under the right conditions, even life.  

We can actually see the star formation process happening throughout space.  If everything came from the Big Bang then everything would be about the same age.  

While everything evolves all animal life forms follow the basic blueprint.  So their essential structure is the same as it has always been.  Humans, pigs, dogs, horses, and gorillas pretty much have all of the same body parts in pretty much the same order.

I wasn't trying to fully explain the BBT. Do you really think that, if she can't envision how the hydrogen could go on to form heavier elements, it was because I failed to start with the detail of quantum physics?

None of the rest of that about large balls of hydrogen or things being the same age has anything to do with what I said.