(October 30, 2015 at 7:10 pm)jenny1972 Wrote: ok your opinion is understood , so now what is your argument that an intelligent being did not create natural laws/organized processes and why do you think that ?
First of all, I don't need to prove you wrong before you should let go of an unevidenced idea. But the truth is, that complete lack of evidence for an intelligent designer is argument enough: we're learning new things about how the universe works every day, but for everything we learn, we never find a designer. We never find anything that requires a design, and we're wise enough to recognize that our current ignorance on a subject is not a reason to make up an answer. The time to form a conclusion is when there is sufficient evidence to do so, not based on leaps based on bits and pieces of arbitrarily stopped and started "logic."
Absence of evidence for a designer is exactly what you would expect in a universe that has no designer, and we have not a shred of evidence for one. That is sufficient.
"YOU take the hard look in the mirror. You are everything that is wrong with this world. The only thing important to you, is you." - ronedee
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!