Here's why Creatards might be right

[jenny1972]

ok your opinion is understood , so now what is your argument that an intelligent being did not create natural laws/organized processes and why do you think that ?

First of all, I don't need to prove you wrong before you should let go of an unevidenced idea. But the truth is, that complete lack of evidence for an intelligent designer is argument enough: we're learning new things about how the universe works every day, but for everything we learn, we never find a designer. We never find anything that requires a design, and we're wise enough to recognize that our current ignorance on a subject is not a reason to make up an answer. The time to form a conclusion is when there is sufficient evidence to do so, not based on leaps based on bits and pieces of arbitrarily stopped and started "logic."

Absence of evidence for a designer is exactly what you would expect in a universe that has no designer, and we have not a shred of evidence for one. That is sufficient.

i see a lot of proof of intelligent design and you dont see any thats fine , moving on , so then you believe that the various different complex systems just developed based on random chance ?