RE: Here's why Creatards might be right
October 30, 2015 at 11:33 pm
(This post was last modified: October 30, 2015 at 11:37 pm by ErGingerbreadMandude.)
(October 30, 2015 at 1:23 pm)Quantum Wrote:(October 30, 2015 at 1:03 pm)pool Wrote: That's dope as fuck
I wonder how those particles knew how to "This is how particles interact with each other, period." They certainly wouldn't have gone like "POOF! NOW I KNOW HOW TO INTERACT WITH OTHER PARTICLES"
Nobody knows. So far we assume that these laws were more or less there in some form. Whether one can say that they "came from" anywhere in a sensible fashion is debatable. There are scientific hypotheses such as the String Landscape, in which the actual properties of particles and the types of forces are randomly chosen due to quantum fluctuations after the universe cools down.
I'm going to give "String Landscape" a read. If it's good enough for me, I'll drop my Creatards might be right moment else I'll stick to it.
Thanks for giving it out though!
As for the others that are still arguing about this, read the bolded part of K's
And for the nth time, I'm sorry for using "explosion" in the place of rapid expansion of a singularity and cooling down of it. Yes, explosion does sound dope don't you dare say otherwise.Aaaaaaaaaaaand I'm not going to say this again for the people that come here -> read one post and then act like they read the whole thread