RE: Exposing the Intellectual Bankruptcy of Atheists Criticizing Religion
November 1, 2015 at 12:26 am
(This post was last modified: November 1, 2015 at 12:28 am by Delicate.)
(November 1, 2015 at 12:22 am)Chuck Wrote:(October 31, 2015 at 11:54 pm)Delicate Wrote: Article: The New Philistinism
The New Atheist writers are supremely self-confident in their ability to dispatch opponents with a sarcastic quip or two. And they show no evidence whatsoever of knowing what they are talking about.
Great article. Worth reading to get an idea of what a joke so many atheist clergy are.
See, it's like this. When the first ignorant moron, of the type you know so well because you are one, came uninvited to say stupid idiotic and supercilious things, as you always do, every last atheist, every last one except may be min, were ready to elevate you above the superstitious cesspool you wallow in.
But like pigs the each and every last one of you, yeah, including you, deli, would prefer to continue to wallow in your cesspit. Which is fine, if you go away and wallow in your bible and your church. But no. You insist on keep coming back and tracking shit all over our new carpets.
You see, that's why we lose patience with you.
When faced with a critical analysis of the intellectual bankruptcy, the typical atheist will fail to refute any of the arguments, but will instead fly into a rage because their precious dogma has been trampled upon.
Your response, as expected, is 100% rage, 0% substance.
I'm looking to bring some substance into the discussion. Ideally someone who:
(a) can read
(b) reads the entire article
(c ) refutes it
Here's what the list is looking like right now.
Substantive atheists: 0
Rage atheists: Chuck
Somewhere-in-the-middle: Kitan