You would think, that a few of you would see the benefit of the study in Romans I was doing for the atheist side of most Christian/atheist arguments, and wouldn't care about trying to invalidate Paul or his contributions. Why?
Because this study in Romans undermines MOST if not all versions of Christianity that hold to strict rules or "extra" absolution/attrition for sin. If you guys put any thought into this at all you'd be asking yourself why you can find so many theists who try and undermine or minimalize the works of Paul. The book of Romans is that up discussed reason. This book puts many of the largest denominational doctrines out of business/in direct violation with biblical Christianity.
I would have though more of you would want me to get you through this book so you could us the bible to try and show some of our more legalistlicy confused brothers how their religion is In Direct contradiction to the bible.
Because this study in Romans undermines MOST if not all versions of Christianity that hold to strict rules or "extra" absolution/attrition for sin. If you guys put any thought into this at all you'd be asking yourself why you can find so many theists who try and undermine or minimalize the works of Paul. The book of Romans is that up discussed reason. This book puts many of the largest denominational doctrines out of business/in direct violation with biblical Christianity.
I would have though more of you would want me to get you through this book so you could us the bible to try and show some of our more legalistlicy confused brothers how their religion is In Direct contradiction to the bible.
