(November 2, 2015 at 1:23 am)Evie Wrote: "Faith" in expertise is surely better than faith in nonexistent ogre shit?
(Yeah I felt like a change from bullshit and horseshit, and I took inspiration from the Halloween RPG I've been playing lately).
So when I ask a question based on an incomplete reading I have spotted from the authors/expert's very own quote, that completely undermines not only his point but in a rational mind challenge his "expert" status. yet content is ignored in favor for his original unchallenged point is not simple faith.
That is blind allegiance.
Again, the "expert" made a wrong comparison between acts 17 28-30 and Romans. When one reads past verse 30 all the way to verse 31 in acts 17 what your "expert" identifies as a contradiction and proof that The book of acts Pail is different than the Paul of Romans. All goes away because acts 17:31 forward bring the passage he quoted verse 30 back in alignment with the book of Romans.
Your expert is an idiot or hopes his followers are, in that they are not willing to look at the context in which he quotes.
