Exposing the Intellectual Bankruptcy of Atheists Criticizing Religion

[Esquilax]

In order for Aquinas to be something that needs refutation, his works would need to contain more than a series of baseless assertions not in evidence. Juuuust sayin'  

Still waiting for your blog posts showing how 'trivially easy' it is to demonstrate what you just now handwaved away. The proofs of the Angelic Doctor stand as witness against you.

We've done this before, Chad. You never once provided a shred of evidence for any of the claims Aquinas made, and judging by the use of self-aggrandizing here instead of actual evidence, I doubt that anything new has come to light in the interim. You're not going to be able to just assert Aquinas into cogency, no matter how flowery your language.