Exposing the Intellectual Bankruptcy of Atheists Criticizing Religion

[Esquilax]

In order for Aquinas to be something that needs refutation, his works would need to contain more than a series of baseless assertions not in evidence. Juuuust sayin'  

Still waiting for your blog posts showing how 'trivially easy' it is to demonstrate what you just now handwaved away. The proofs of the Angelic Doctor stand as witness against you.

Hey guys, remember when I was like "you're a dirty New Atheist when you won't give the unsupported arguments-instead-of-evidence of christianity's old thinkers deference for no reason, you're a New Atheist for recognizing that you can't just define god into existence, so apologetics is just skipping step one"? Remember when I said not treating apologia with unearned reverence is the biggest crime, the one that gets you scoffed at?

Chad, were you just trying to prove me right, there?